The Risk Analysis and Regulation Suggestions of Network Mutual Aid Platform
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v24i.1523Keywords:
Network Mutual Aid; Insurance Business; Transparency Principles; Regulatory Technology; Inclusive RegulationAbstract
As an emerging inclusive financial model, network mutual aid has a wide range of beneficiaries and low risk protection threshold, which can satisfies the healthcare needs of the long-tail people excluded by traditional insurance. However, these risks like financial risk, information risk, operation risk and other hidden risk are induced due to network mutual aid platform unified legal nature and imperfect regulatory system. We should build a sound regulatory system, clarify the network mutual platform regulatory agency, take the protection of consumer interests as the basic value and rely on the principle of transparency to strengthen the platform information disclosure obligation. Meanwhile, It is necessary to improve regulatory capabilities and promote development of network mutual aid platforms by actively adopting innovative concepts such as regulatory technology and inclusive supervision.
Downloads
References
He Qihao and Zhang Junyan. The Rise and Fall of Re-Mutualization? --An Analysis of the Legal Nature and Regulatory Response of Online Mutual Aid[J]. Economic and Trade Law Review, 2022(1): 104-119.
Sang Benkian. How Legal Doctrines Arise--An Analysis Based on a Consequentialist Perspective[J]. Jurists Review, 2019(4): 1-16.
Lee R. Russ, Thomas F. Segalla. Couch on Insurance 3d, Clark Boardman Callaghan, 2005.
Shao Zhiquan, Wu Qiong. Research on Legal Risks and Regulation of Online Mutual Aid Platforms--Based on Member Protection Perspective[J]. Shanghai Insurance, 2019(12): 53-57.
Xu Duoqi. The Social Characteristics of Internet Financial Risks and Regulatory Innovation[J]. Chinese Journal of Law, 2018(5): 20-39.
Zheng Bingwen. The Nature, Risks and Regulation of Online Mutual Aid[J]. Macroeconomic Management, 2020(10): 7-23.
Zhang Wenjie. Zheng Liansheng. Distributed ledger technology and its application in the insurance trust system: the example of mutual treasure[J]. Credit Reference, 2020(7): 33-44.
Nie Jianliang. Sun Zhihong, Wu Yufeng. Social Network and the Realization of Rural Mutual Assistance for the Aged[J]. Social Security Studies, 2021(04): 22-33.
Zhao Yaning. Private Law Positioning and Right-Obligation-Liability Allocation of Network Mutual Assistance[J]. Western Law Review, 2021(02): 1-19.
Xia Weihua. Exploration of insurance innovation development model under the empowerment of block chain technology--to mutual insurance as an example [J]. Finance and Accounting Monthly, 2020(21): 128-133.
Li Hailong, Liu Yue. The case study of "mutual insurance" [J]. Financial Theory and Practice, 2020(09): 105-110.
Duan Liqiong, Fang Yuan. The legal nature of online mutual aid schemes during the epidemic [J]. People’s judicature application, 2020(25): 58-65.
Ying Yang. Deny Network Mutual Assistance’s Insurance Nature [J]. Scientific and Social Research, 2021, 3(6).
Nir Kshetri. The evolution of cyber-insurance industry and market: An institutional analysis [J]. Telecommunications Policy, 2020, 44(8).
Chen An, Hieber Peter, Lämmlein Lars. Regulatory measures for distressed insurance undertakings: a comparative study [J]. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2020(1): 30-43.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
