The Impact of Equity Incentives on Idiosyncratic Risk: Evidence from the Panel Regression Analysis

Authors

  • Jiahao Chen
  • Zhelin Fan
  • Yinhan Guo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v27i.1953

Keywords:

Idiosyncratic risk; Equity incentive; Agency issues; Internal control.

Abstract

Idiosyncratic risk of listed firms has attracted the attention of a series of researchers. Using the data of A-share listed firms in the Shanghai Stock Exchange and Shenzhen Stock Exchange, we examine the impact of equity incentives on listed firms’ idiosyncratic risks. Based on the panel regression model and fixed effects model, we find that the degree of equity incentives is positively correlated with idiosyncratic risk. This correlation is robust to a series of robustness checks including the use of alternative samples and the inclusion of some possibly omitted variables. Further analysis shows that equity incentives would not infect the idiosyncratic risk of SOE companies, but have a significant and positive impact on the idiosyncratic risk of non-SOE companies; the impact of equity incentives is more pronounced to the firms with better corporate governance, which have Big-4 auditors and more analysts. These findings provide support to the notion that equity incentive is positively associated with corporate idiosyncratic risk.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Loderer, C. & Martin, K., 1997. Executive stock ownership and performance tracking faint traces. Journal of Financial Economics, 45, 223-255.

McConnell and Servaes, 1990, “Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.27, pp.596-612 - References - Scientific Research Publishing

Liu, G. and Wang, J., 2000. Atlantis-press.com. Available at: <https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125910891.pdf> [Accessed 13 June 2021].

Hollis Ashbaugh-Skaife et al. "The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies on Firm Risk and Cost of Equity". Journal of Accounting Research 47.1(2009): 1-43.

Maria Ogneva and K. R. Subramanyam and K. Raghunandan. "Internal Control Weakness and Cost of Equity: Evidence from SOX Section 404 Disclosures". The Accounting Review 82.5(2007): 1255-1297.

Aggarwal, R.K., and, A.A. Samwick. 2006. Empire Builders and Shirkers: Investment, Firm Performance and Managerial Incentives. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3): P489 - 515

Hall, B.J., Liebman, J.B., 1998. Are CEOs really paid like bureaucrats? Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, P653 - 691.

Jensen, M.C., and Meckling, W.H., 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3 ( 4) : P305 - 60

Panousi, V., and D. Papanikolaou. 2012. Investment, Idiosyncratic Risk, and Ownership. Journal of Finance, 67(3) : P1113 - 1148

Aboody, D. and Kasznik, R. “CEO stock option awards and the timing of corporate voluntary disclosures”. 2000, Vol.29 (1), p.73-100

Agrawal A, Cooper T. “Accounting scandals in IPO firms: do underwriters and VCs help?”. Journal of economics & management strategy, 2010-12, Vol.19 (4), p.1117-1181

Downloads

Published

2022-09-06

How to Cite

Chen, J., Fan, Z., & Guo, Y. (2022). The Impact of Equity Incentives on Idiosyncratic Risk: Evidence from the Panel Regression Analysis. BCP Business & Management, 27, 69-79. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v27i.1953