The Growing Impotance of International Arbitration in International Commerce
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v27i.1976Keywords:
International arbitration, international commerce, foreign investmentAbstract
Following the rise and growth of globalization and emerging economies, business misunderstandings and disputes that transcend national borders may also be increasing. Such disputes could impede the functioning of international commerce. National legal mechanisms may not be an attractive option for international investors. On the contrary, international arbitration has become the preference of foreign investors through which many disputes can be resolved via an independent forum. To offer insights on this issue theoretically and empirically, this paper presents a discussion to investigate why international arbitration is important for the functioning of international commerce. The paper finds that international arbitration is conductive to promoting foreign direct investment, bringing cost and speed benefits and providing finality in the decision-making process. This proposition will be substantiated by focusing on previous research and particular examples.
Downloads
References
Beerbower, John E, ‘International Arbitration: Can We Realise the Potential?’, [2011] 27(1) Arbitration International 75–90.
Smith, Steven, Ivana Cingel, Benjamin Jones, Kevin Rubino, Qais Ghafary, and Brian Chang, ‘International Arbitration’ [2013] 47(4) The International Lawyer 115-28.
Hu, Diana, ‘International Arbitration in Australia: Selected Case Notes and Trends’, [2012] 19 Australian International Law Journal 181–211.
Chao Wang, ‘International Arbitration of Maritime Delimitation: An Alternative for East Asia?’, [2014] 7(2) Journal of East Asia and International Law 427–441.
Stephenson, Andrew, and Ong, Mevelyn, ‘The Domestic and International Arbitration Landscape in Australia’, [2012] 29(3) The International Construction Law Review 357-365.
Ten Cate, Irene M, ‘International Arbitration and the Ends of Appellate Review’ [2012] 44(4) New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 1109-1204.






