Prediction Of Stock Performance in The U.S. Stock Market Based on Logistic Regression Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v38i.3728Keywords:
prediction of stock performance, U.S. stock market, financial and accounting ratios, logistic regression model.Abstract
How to select stocks as investment targets is a hot issue of concern in the investment market. Some researchers have found that the quintile ranking of payout, valuation, profitability, and historical growth in the market can be used as a screening basis to help investors make initial selections. However, the differences in ranking within the same quintile are still obvious, which does not allow for a fine and clear selection. Therefore, in this paper, by collecting the data profile of more than five thousand US stocks from 2015 to 2021 and fitting a logistic model to the data, the author examines price to book ratio, sales growth rate, price to earnings ratio, gross profit to asset ratio, return on equity, dividend yield and earnings per share to predict whether the stocks will outperform in the future, and further derive the result of whether it is worth investing or not under different decision thresholds to help differently risk-averse investors to screen stocks. The results show that for the prediction of whether stocks would “outperform or not”, the final model’s prediction was 71.28 percent accurate. This excellent result shows that this logistic model can be applied to the real market to help general investors and investment institutions to select the right stocks.
Downloads
References
Falinouss, P. (2007). Stock trend prediction using news articles: a text mining approach.
Mubin, M., Iqbal, A., & Hussain, A. (2014). Determinant of return on assets and return on equity and its industry wise effects: evidence from KSE (Karachi Stock Exchange). Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, The International Institute for Science. Technology and Education, 5(5), 148-158.
Wijaya, M., & Yustina, A. I. (2019). The impact of financial ratio toward stock price: evidence from banking companies. JAAF (Journal of Applied Accounting and Finance), 1(1), 27-44.
Ali, S. S., Mubeen, M., Lal, I., & Hussain, A. (2018). Prediction of stock performance by using logistic regression model: evidence from Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX). Asian Journal of Empirical Research, 8(7), 247-258.
Smita, M. (2021). Logistic regression model for predicting performance of S&P BSE 30 company using IBM SPSS. International Journal of Mathematics Trends and Technology, 6(7), 118-134.
Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis, and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. Journal of Finance, 23, 589-609.
Abdel-Khalik, A. R., & Lusk, E. J. (1974). Transfer pricing-a synthesis. The Accounting Review, 49(1), 8-23.
Fama, E., & French, K. (1988). Permanent and temporary components of stock prices. Journal of Political Economy 96, 246-273.
Lee, S. (2004). Application of likelihood ratio and logistic regression models to landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Environmental Management, 34(2), 223-232.
Dutta, A., Bandopadhyay, G., & Sengupta, S. (2008). Classification and prediction of stock performance using logistic regression. An Empirical Examination from Indian Stock Market: Redefining Business Horizons: McMillan Advanced Research Series, 46-62.
Dutta, A., Bandopadhyay, G., & Sengupta, S. (2015). Prediction of stock performance in Indian stock market using logistic regression. International Journal of Business and Information, 7(1), 105- 136.
Novy-Marx, R. (2013). The other side of value: The gross profitability premium. Journal of financial economics, 108(1), 1-28.
Kleinbaum, D. G., Kupper, L. L., Nizam, A., & Rosenberg, E. S. (2014). Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. Cengage Learning. 5th Edition.
Kohavi, R., & Provost, F. (1998). Confusion matrix. Machine learning, 30(2-3), 271-274.
Maria Navin, J. R., & Pankaja, R. (2016). Performance analysis of text classification algorithms using confusion matrix. International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research (IJETR), 6(4), 75-8.






