The Development of the IS-LM-EE model and its Implications for Economic Policy

Authors

  • Zining Chen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v38i.4135

Keywords:

Ecological economics; IS-LM-EE models; Policy implications; Carbon emissions issues.

Abstract

The macroeconomic activity must consider the effects of the ecological environment as ecological sustainability increasingly constrains humans’ economic behaviour. Therefore, how to use fiscal and monetary policy tools to achieve harmonious economic and environmental development has become a hot topic of research among scholars. As a result, this study begins by distinguishing between the IS-LM-EE family of models and the various impacts of the same combination of monetary and fiscal policies on economic growth. It is discovered that the link between environment and capital is not clearly described in the models, which results in a variety of policy consequences. For example, tight fiscal and expansionary monetary policy would boost the economy in the Heyes and Sim IS-LM-EE models, whereas the Decker and Wohar model would experience an economic downturn as a result of the same policy combination. Meanwhile, the models of Heyes, Lawn, Decker and Warhar lack further automatic adjustment methods, and although the Sim model features an adjustment mechanism, its lag can significantly affect its effectiveness. Secondly, the study employs Heyes' model as a theoretical basis to simulate the economic impact of government policies including carbon emission quotas and concludes by summarising the limitations of the existing models.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rezai, A. and Stagl, S. Ecological macroeconomics: Introduction and review. Ecological Economics, 2016, 121:181-185.

Maes, J. and Jacobs, S. Nature-Based Solutions for Europe's Sustainable Development. Conservation Letters, 2015, 10(1): 121-124.

Daly, H. Towards an Environmental Macroeconomics. Land Economics, 1991, 67(2): 255.

Heyes, A. A proposal for the greening of textbook macro: “IS-LM-EE”. Ecological Economics, 2000, 32: 1-7.

Lawn, P. On Heyes' IS–LM–EE proposal to establish an environmental macroeconomics. Environment and Development Economics, 2002, 8(1): 31-56.

Lawn, P. Environmental Macroeconomics: Extending the IS-LM Model to Include an 'Environmental Equilibrium' Curve. Australian Economic Papers, 2003, 42(1): 118-134.

Sim, N. Environmental Keynesian macroeconomics: Some further discussion. Ecological Economics, 2006, 59(4): 401-405.

Decker, C. and Wohar, M. Substitutability or complementarity? Re-visiting Heyes’ IS-LM-EE model. Ecological Economics, 2012, 74: 3-7.

Harris, J. Macroeconomic policy and sustainability. G-DAE Working Paper. 2001, 01-09

Venkatachalam, L. Environmental economics and ecological economics: Where they can converge? Ecological Economics, 2007, 61(2-3): 550-558.

Halkos, G. and Paizanos, E. The effect of government expenditure on the environment: An empirical investigation. Ecological Economics, 2013, 91: 48-56.

United Nationals Environment Programme (UNEP). The Emissions Gap Report. a UN Environment Synthesis Report. 2016

Annicchiarico, B. and Di Dio, F. Environmental policy and macroeconomic dynamics in a new Keynesian model. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2015, 69: 1-21.

Zhang, M. Effect of carbon emission cap on equilibrium output based on IS-LM-EE model. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 2018, 16(2): 1869-1881.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-02

How to Cite

Chen, Z. (2023). The Development of the IS-LM-EE model and its Implications for Economic Policy. BCP Business & Management, 38, 2529-2535. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v38i.4135