The Government Subsidies effect on the Company Strategic Change-Theory and Emprical
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v38i.4240Keywords:
Government subsidies; Strategic reform; Tenure of CEO; Characteristics of the top management team.Abstract
Government environmental regulation is an important policy to promote industrial development. In view of the fact that the implementation of the enterprise's production strategy is not motivated enough, the government will directly subsidize the enterprise, healthy and stable development of the enterprise. Based on dynamic managerial capabilities theory and top management team theory, this paper takes Chinese A-share listed companies from 2012 to 2020 as research samples to theoretically analyze and empirically test the impact of government subsidies on strategic change. This paper also demonstrates the moderating effect of property right nature, tenure of top management team and career background of top management team on the above mentioned two relationships. The results in the research show as follows. Firstly, government subsidies are significantly positively correlated with the degree of strategic change. Secondly, in state-owned enterprises, government subsidies are positively correlated with strategic change, while in non-state-owned enterprises, they are not significantly correlated. Thirdly, tenure of the executive team weakens the positive correlation between government subsidies and the degree of strategic change. Fourthly, the "productive style" career background of the top management can enhance the positive correlation between government subsidies and strategic change. This paper not only enriches the research results of dynamic management ability and strategic decision-making, but also provides beneficial enlightenment for enterprises to implement strategic reform, which can response to the changing external environment and absorbing external social resources.
Downloads
References
Helfat, C. E.; Peteraf, M. A., MANAGERIAL COGNITIVE CAPABILITIES AND THE MICROFOUNDATIONS OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES. Strategic Management Journal 2015, 36, (6), 831-850.
Pfeffer, J.; Salancik, G. R., The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press: 2003.
McClelland, P. L.; Liang, X.; Barker III, V. L., CEO commitment to the status quo: Replication and extension using content analysis. Journal of Management 2010, 36, (5), 1251-1277.
Miller, D., Stale in the saddle: CEO tenure and the match between organization and environment. Management science 1991, 37, (1), 34-52.
Musteen, M.; Barker III, V. L.; Baeten, V. L., CEO attributes associated with attitude toward change: The direct and moderating effects of CEO tenure. Journal of Business Research 2006, 59, (5), 604-612.
Beck, M.; Lopes-Bento, C.; Schenker-Wicki, A., Radical or incremental: Where does R&D policy hit? Research Policy 2016, 45, (4), 869-883.
Alessandri, T. M.; Pattit, J. M., Drivers of R&D investment: The interaction of behavioral theory and managerial incentives. Journal of Business Research 2014, 67, (2), 151-158.
Cao, Q.; Simsek, Z.; Zhang, H., Modelling the joint impact of the CEO and the TMT on organizational ambidexterity. Journal of Management Studies 2010, 47, (7), 1272-1296.
Simsek, Z.; Heavey, C.; Veiga, J. F., The impact of CEO core self‐evaluation on the firm's entrepreneurial orientation. Strategic Management Journal 2010, 31, (1), 110-119.
Finkelstein, S.; Hambrick, D.; Cannella, A. A., Strategic leadership. St. Paul: West Educational Publishing 1996.
Bantel, K. A.; Jackson, S. E., Top management and innovations in banking: does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic management journal 1989, 10, (S1), 107-124.
Carmeli, A., Top management team behavioral integration and the performance of service organizations. Group & Organization Management 2008, 33, (6), 712-735.
Díaz-Fernández, M. C.; González-Rodríguez, M. R.; Simonetti, B., Top Management Teams’ demographic characteristics and their influence on strategic change. Quality & Quantity 2015, 49, (3), 1305-1322.






