Comparison Between NPV and IRR: Evaluation of Investment

Authors

  • Junqi Huang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v40i.4373

Keywords:

Net present value; internal rate of return; comparison; investment.

Abstract

The net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR) are frequently used criteria for choosing capital investment projects which has been used for long days since they been created. But these two indicators may lead to contrary result in certain situations. This difference caused the debate that last more than a century about which investment deciding methods is better. Naturally, research on the inadequacy of these two methods has also continued for a long time and achieved many results such as a more reliable IRR calculation method - MIRR, the analysis of multiple roots in the IRR calculation in complex cases to determine the final result. This paper gives the brief definitions of NPV and IRR, and how they are calculated. The questions of when to use different investment decision-making methods is also answered in the paper. After that, the advantages and disadvantages of NPV and IRR were analyzed. At the same time, this paper has also fully researched the improvement of the deficiencies of two investment deciding methods. Finally, this paper compares NPV and IRR, and analyzes why these two methods lead to different results in some certain situations and which investment decision methods is relatively better in investment and draw the final conclusion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Michael J. Osborne, “A resolution to the NPV–IRR debate?” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 50.2(2010):234-239.

Ryan, Patricia A., and Glenn P. Ryan. "Capital budgeting practices of the Fortune 1000: how have things changed. “Journal of business and management 8.4 (2002): 355-364.

Investopedia,https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/032615/what-formula-calculating-net-present-value-npv.asp, last accessed 2022/10/18.

Stephen A. Ros, “Uses, Abuses, and Alternatives to the Net-Present-Value Rule” Financial Management 24.3(1995): 96-102.

Zixiang FU, Discussion of the internal rate of return and the net present value method (1987).

Mackevičius J, Tomaševič V. Evaluation of investment projects in case of conflict between the internal rate of return and the net present value methods[J]. Ekonomika, 2010, 89(4): 116-130.

HerbertKierulff, MIRR: A better measure, Business Horizons Volume 51, Issue 4, July–August 2008, Pages 321-329.

Bierman, H., & Smidt, S. (2007). The capital budgeting decision (9th ed.). New York, N.Y: Routledge.

Promislow S D, Spring D. Postulates for the internal rate of return of an investment project [J]. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1996, 26(3): 325-361.

Qiqian Cheng, Investment and Project Apprasial (2010).

Downloads

Published

2023-03-08