Priority options for the 17 UN Sustainable Development Strategies
Based on the model network perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v49i.5432Keywords:
Grey Relational Analysis, Interpretative Structural Modeling, Dematel model, Multiple linear regression.Abstract
The United Nations has set 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which are expected to be achieved by 2030. In order to achieve these goals as soon as possible, we need to prioritize the selection of SDGs that have a significant role, a high impact, and a wide range of relevance, and focus our efforts on prioritizing these goals. This paper mainly adopts the method of building mathematical models to study, aiming at the relationship between 17SDGs, the selection of priorities, and the test of models, three models are mainly established after the target is quantified. On the combing of the relationship, the goal relation network between 17SDGs is obtained by establishing the grey relational degree - ISM coupling model. With regard to priority selection, the Dematel model was established to calculate the impact degree, affected degree, centrality, cause degree and weight of goals, and some priorities in 17SDGs were established through analysis. As for the model testing, based on the actual situation in China, the coupled model of grey forecasting and multiple linear regression was established to predict the situation of each SDGs after 10 years to achieve the role of model testing. Combined with the current reality, the model is actually applied against the background of the current international pandemic of COVID-19, and the goal relation network and priorities of the current 17SDGs are obtained. The results show that the current implementation of 17SDGs can be divided into one, two, and three levels in order of priority from urgent to slow. Focusing on achieving the highest priority goals in this general order will have a wider and more visible impact, while removing some obstacles and providing more support for the realization of the lower goals, so that all SDGs can be achieved as soon as possible.
Downloads
References
AEA, BEC. A fuzzy DEMATEL method to evaluate critical operational hazards during gas freeing process in crude oil tankers[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2015, 38:243-253.
Zhang Ying, Dong Guoqiang, Lei Ying, et al. Risk analysis of subsea crude oil pipeline Leakage based on DEMATEL and Logic Tree [J]. Journal of safety and environment, 2020, 20 (5) : 1690-1694. The DOI: 10.13637 / j.i SSN. 1009-6094.2020.0300.
Yue Rentian, Han Yaxiong. Research on DEMATEL-ISM Model of Airline Safety Risk Factor Analysis [J]. Journal of safety and environment, 2020, 20 (6) : 2091-2097. The DOI: 10.13637 / j.i SSN. 1009-6094.2019.0799.
Warfield J N . SOCIETAL SYSTEMS Planning, Policy and Complexity[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1978, 66(3):362-363.
Huang Wei. Methodological Enlightenment of hacker and Anti-hacker thinking research -- a new exploration of explanatory structure model [D]. South China Normal University,2003.
BaUls V A , Turoff M . Scenario construction via Delphi and cross-impact analysis[J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2011, 78(9):1579-1602.
Ni Biao, Huang Wei. Evaluation Model of Military Training Method Extensibility based on Adversarial Interpretive Structure Model [J]. Military Operations Research and Systems Engineering,2020,34(02):46-51.
Xu Yanhong, Chen Qiangqiang, Yang Ling et al. Research on Cooperation Stability of Pharmaceutical farmer + acquirer based on integrated DEMATEL-ISM Model [J]. Productivity research, 2023, No. 366 (01) : 103-107 + 128. DOI: 10.19374 / j.carol carroll nki. 14-1145 / f 2023.01.009.
Xiao Liangcheng, Cai Yuxuan, Liu Tongxiang. Study on the hierarchical structure of wildfire source factors based on DEMATEL-ISM Model: A case study of Ji 'an County, Jiangxi Province [J]. Science of Biohazard, 2022,45(04):432-439.
Chen Guangfu, Han Huizhen. Based on neighborhood structure and symmetric nonnegative matrix decomposition of the weighted network link prediction [J]. Journal of microelectronics and computers, 2022, 33 (05) 6:62-70. The DOI: 10.19304 / J.I SSN1000-7180.2021.1156.
Lu Jiehua, Wei Xiaodan. Gender inequality under the impact of COVID-19: Current dilemma, issue reflection and response path [J]. Journal of Hebei Studies,2022,42(06):149-158.
Li Jingkun. COVID-19 highlights racial inequality in the United Kingdom [J]. World Socialist Studies,2021,6(08):78-87+100.
Song Jing. New crown has intensified global gender inequality [N]. Physicians, 2022-03-10 (B02). DOI: 10.44211 / n.c. Nki nysbz. 2022.000066.
Fang Lianquan. Social poverty and inequality in Latin American countries under the impact of COVID-19: a perspective on social structural vulnerability [J]. Latin American Studies, 21,43(05):137-153+158.
Zhang Jie, Hu Zhuzhou, Zhao Zicen et al. Research on power grid asset life prediction model: A case study based on survey data of power grid enterprises in J Province [J]. Friends of Accounting,2023,No.707(11):94-99.






