Labor Relations Atmosphere and Staff Efficiency, Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy

Shuqi Zhang

doi:10.54691/bcpbm.v49i.5461

Authors

Shuqi Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v49i.5461

Keywords:

labor relations atmosphere; staff efficiency; self-efficacy.

Abstract

The effect of self-efficacy on the "mechanism of labor relations atmosphere and staff efficiency" is a new perspective to answer the question of "how to improve staff efficiency". In this study, 311 valid questionnaires were used to investigate the mechanism of labor relations atmosphere on staff efficiency through empirical research and linear regression model analysis, and to verify whether self-efficacy has an effect on staff efficiency through the mediating effect of self-efficacy. The results showed that labor relations atmosphere has a significant positive relationship with both staff efficiency and self-efficacy, and self-efficacy not only has a direct effect on staff efficiency, but also plays a role as a mediating variable between labor relations atmosphere and staff efficiency, constructing a "labor relations atmosphere → self-efficacy → staff efficiency" mechanism model and was validated. This study added a new perspective for human resources on how to improve staff efficiency, which not only provides a new solution for companies in improving staff efficiency, but also provides new research ideas for subsequent studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bandura, Albert. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. [J]Psychological Review, 1977, 84(2), 191–215.

Gu Y., Peng J. The Effect of Organizational Creative Climate on Employees' Creative Behavior:The Moderating Effect of Creative Self-efficacy[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2010, 13(01):30-41.

Kaufman B E . Human resources and industrial relations: Commonalities and differences[J]. 2001, 11(4):339-374.

Yang M., Wang Qun. The management of new generation employees from the perspective of intergenerational differentiation of values[J]. Leadership Science,2014(20):49-50.

Geertz C . Agricultural Involution: The Processes of Ecological Change in Indonesia[M]. 1963.

Nicholson, Nigel. Industrial Relations Climate: A Case Study Approach[J]. Personnel Review, 1979, 8(3):20-25.

Katz H C , Kochan T A , Gobeille K R . Industrial Relations Performance, Economic Performance, and QWL Programs: An Interplant Analysis[J]. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 1983.

Nakamura A O , Shaw K L , Freeman R B , et al. Studies of Labor Market Intermediation[J]. David Autor, 2009.

Dastmalchian, Ali, Adamson, et al. Developing a Measure of Industrial Relations Climate[J]. Relations Industrielles, 1986.

Paul Blyton. Developing the Concept of Industrial Relations Climate[J]. Journal of Industrial Relations, 1987, 29(2) : 207-216.

Gordon, M. and R. Ladd. Dual Allegiance: Renewal, Reconsideration, and Recantation [J]. Personnel Psychology, 1990(43):37-69.

Dastmalchian A , Blyton P , Adamson R . Industrial relations climate: Testing a construct[J]. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 1989, 62(1):21-32.

Kersley B , Bryson A , Alpin C , et al. Inside the Workplace: First Findings from the 2004 Workplace Employment Relations Survey. 2006.

Bandura A . Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.[J]. Advances in Behaviour Research & Therapy, 1977, 1(4):139-161.

Cui X.,Wu H. Labor Relations Atmosphere Study [J]. China Human Resource Development,2011(03):5-9.

Tubre T , Jr W A , Jr W B . General Models of Job Performance: Theory and Practice.[J]. 2006.

Van, Scotter, James, et al. Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance.[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1996, 81(5):525-531.

Wang C.,Hu Z.,Liu Y. Evidences for Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of General SelfEfficacy Scale [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology (1):37-40.

J. Scott Armstrong and Terry S. Overton. Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1977, 14(3) : 396-402.

Baron R M , Kenny D A . The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.[J]. Chapman and Hall, 1986, 51(6):1173-1182.