Study on the coupling coordination degree between digital sharing of social public resources and urban-rural integration development in China

Authors

  • Shengzhu Li
  • Wei Tan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v18i.556

Keywords:

Digital sharing of social public resources, Integrated urban-rural development, Coupling coordination

Abstract

In digital clarify public resources and the coupling mechanism of urban and rural integration development, on the basis of establishing evaluation index system, using the entropy method to measure China's 30 provinces social public resources sharing digital level and the level of urban and rural integration development, by using the coupling coordination degree model and spatial doberman model, the analysis of features of the two coupling coordination and its influencing factors. The results show that the level of digital sharing of social public resources and the coupling coordination degree of urban-rural integration development increased with fluctuation from 2015 to 2019. The national average coupling coordination degree is near disordered. From the perspective of spatial evolution, the overall coupling coordination degree presents a spatial pattern of "high in the east and low in the west". Areas with high coupling coordination degree show the characteristics of central polarization relying on urban agglomeration, while areas with low coupling coordination degree show the characteristics of regional locking.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wen Tiejun, LAN Yonghai, Yang Shuai. Organizational innovation and rent socialization: A case study of Public resource governance in Hangzhou under the "New Normal" [J]. Journal of National Academy of Governance, 2016(02): 51-57.

Mcgee T.G. The Emergence of Desakota Regions in Asia: Expanding a Hypothesis//in Ginsburg N., Koppel B, and Mcgee T.G. The Extended Metropolis: settlement transition in Asia [M]. Honolulu: University of Hawaii press, 1991.

Du Z, Zhang X.Trend and policy analysis of global rural development and the evolution of urban-rural relationship [J].The World of Survey and Research, 2006(7): 7-8.

Daniele T, Enrica D, PatriziaT.The urban nature of agriculture: Bidirectional trends between city and countryside [J].Cities, 2011, 29(6): 412-416.

Bjørkhaug H, Knickel K. Rethinking the links between farm modernisation, rural development and resilience. [J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2018 (59): 194-196.

Zhou Jiangyan, Bai Yongxiu. China Industrial Economics, 2014(02): 5-17. (in Chinese)

Zhou Jianing, Qin Fucang, Liu Jia, ZHU Gaoli, Zou Wei. China population, resources and environment, 2019, 29(09): 166-176.

Zhang Xinlin, Qiu Fangdao, Zhu Chuangeng. [J]. Journal of natural resources, 2020, 35(08): 1867-1880.

Zhang Helin, DU Yonghui. Journal of zhengzhou university (philosophy and social sciences), 2019, 52(01): 45-49+127.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-13