Analysis of the Current Situation of Sustainable Development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt based on SDGs

Authors

  • Zihan Dai

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/mjgsy230

Keywords:

Yangtze River Economic Belt; Sustainable Development Goals; Chinese Path to Modernization; Coupling Coordination Degree Model.

Abstract

This paper evaluates the level of sustainable development of 11 provinces and cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2011 to 2020, and analyzes its spatial and temporal differentiation and trend evolution characteristics. This paper adopts the coupling coordination model based on CRITIC-entropy weight combination weight, spatial autocorrelation model, spatial Markov chain and other methods, based on the measurement indicators of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, and conducts a comprehensive evaluation from four aspects: innovation-driven, welfare guarantee, resources and environment, and economic development. The research results show that the sustainable development level of the Yangtze River Economic Belt presents the characteristics of continuous improvement, regional difference, hierarchical leap, spatial dependence, spillover effect, etc. According to the research findings, this paper puts forward some suggestions, such as strengthening regional coordinated development, optimizing spatial planning and governance, coordinating policies and work, promoting rule of law and innovation, etc., aiming to promote the high-quality development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, achieve the coordinated development of economy, society and ecology, and localize the SDGs. This paper’s research has important theoretical significance and practical value for deeply understanding the current situation and problems of sustainable development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Heimann, T. Bioeconomy and SDGs: Does the bioeconomy support the achievement of the SDGs? Earth's Future, 2019, 7, 43–57.

Liu, S.; Bai, J.; Chen, J. Measuring SDG 15 at the County Scale: Localization and Practice of SDGs Indicators Based on Geospatial Information. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2019, 8, 515.

Stevenson, S., Collins, A., Jennings, N. et al. A hybrid approach to identifying and assessing interactions between climate action (SDG13) policies and a range of SDGs in a UK context. Discov Sustain 2, 2021, 43.

Shao Chaofeng, Chen Sihan, Gao Junli, et al. Design of China’s sustainable development evaluation index system based on the SDGs. China Population,Resources and Environment. 2021,31(4) :1-12.

Ma Tao, Tan Naihong, Hong tao. "Local Decomposition and Response to China's Sustainable Development Strategy in the 14th Five-Year Plan Period. Study & Exploration. 2022, No.322 (05): 127-134.

Jia Kun, Sheng Qianyu, Liu Changwen, et al. Measurement of land sustainable development level for SDGs and diagnosis of the obstacle factors in the middle and lower reaches of Yellow River. Journal of China Agricultural University. 2022, 27(9): 237-247.

Wang Huijuan, Lan Zongmin. Construction, Measurement and Evaluation of Sustainable Development Indicator System for Chinese Cities. Journal of Commercial Economics.2022, (07), 184-188.

Chen Sihan, Shao Chaofeng, Gao Junli, et al. Evaluation technology and application of sustainable development in resource-dependent cities based on SDGs: a case study of Chenzhou, Hunan Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 2022, 42(12): 4807-4822.

Zhang Pingdan, Yuan Haoming, Tian Xin. Sustainable development in China: Trends, patterns, and determinants of the “Five Modernizations” in Chinese cities, Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 214, 2019, Pages 685-695.

Tang D, Li Z, Bethel BJ. Relevance Analysis of Sustainable Development of China's Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on Spatial Structure. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 23; 16(17): 3076.

Guo Fuyou, Lyu Xiao, Yu Wei, et al. Performance evaluation and driving mechanism of green development in Shandong Province based on panel data of 17 cities. Scientia Geographica Sinica. 2020, 40(2): 200-210.

Diakoulaki D, Mavrotas G, Papayannakis L. Determining Objective Weights in Multiple Criteria Problems: The CRITIC Method [J]. Computers & Operations Research, 1995, 22 (7): 763 -770.

Wu Zhong, Guan Jiao, He Jiang. An Empirical Study on the Calculation of Minimum Wage Standard Dynamic Combination Calculation Based on Objective Weight of CRITIC-Entropy Weight Method. Modern Economic Science. 2019, 41(3), 103-117.

Zhang Lijun, Zhang Xiao. Weighted clustering method based on improved CRITIC method. Statistics & Decision. 2015, (22): 65-68.

Fu Weizhong, Chu Liuping. Research on the Evaluation of High Quality Development of Manufacturing Industry From the Perspective of Integration of the Yangtze River Delta-TOPSIS Evaluation Model Based on Improved CRITCAL-Entropy Weight Method. 2020, 39(09): 145-152.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Dai, Z. (2024). Analysis of the Current Situation of Sustainable Development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt based on SDGs. Frontiers in Sustainable Development, 4(4), 152-164. https://doi.org/10.54691/mjgsy230