Comparative Corpus-based Study of Evaluative it Patterns in Middle School Learners’ Writing: Taking “it is ADJ that” Pattern as an Example

Yuejia Wu

doi:10.54691/0fptam52

Authors

Yuejia Wu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/0fptam52

Keywords:

English Writing; Evaluative it Patterns; It is ADJ that; Corpus.

Abstract

Evaluative it patterns, as an important device for writers to express attitudinal and evaluative meaning, have increasingly been one of the topics of Corpus Linguistics. By adopting the corpus-based approach, this paper explores the frequencies, types , and functions of the it is ADJ that subpattern in evaluative it patterns. Results show that: in terms of frequency, the use of it is ADJ that occurs significantly more frequently in native learners' texts than in Chinese learners' texts. In terms of types, there are obvious differences between the two. The types used by native learners are more diverse, while Chinese learners are more single. The function of it is ADJ that is mainly reflected in its adjective use, and the semantic preferences of the patterns of two are significantly different. Native learners make greater use of the patterns to assess likelihood of propositions whereas Chinese middle school learners use them more often to imply certainty. The results of this study shed light on the teaching of English teaching practice of this structure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Biber, D. et al. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English [M]. Essex: Person Education.

Degaetano-Ortlieb, S. (2015). ‘Evaluative meaning and cohesion: the structuring function of evaluative meaning in scientific writing’[J]. Discourse, (16), 3-29.

Dong, J., and Jiang, F. (2019). Construing evaluation through patterns: registers pecific variations of the introductory it patterns[J]. Australian Journal of Linguistics. (39), 32-56.

Francis,G., S. Hunston&E. Mannings. (1998). Collins COBUILD Grammar Patterns 2: Nouns and Adjectives [M]. London: HarperCollins.

Groom, N. (2005). Pattern and meaning across genres and disciplines: an exploratory study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(3), 257-277.

Gómez-González, M. A. (1997). On subject it-extrapositions: evidence from Present-Day English[J]. Alicante Journal of English Studies. (10), 95-107.

Herriman, J. (2000). Extraposition in English: A study of the interaction between the matrix clause predicate and the type of extraposed clause[J]. English Studies, (81), 582-599.

Hewings, M., & Hewings, A. (2002). “It is interesting to note that...”: A comparative study of anticipatory ‘it’ in student and published writing[J]. English for Specific Purposes, (21), 367-383.

Hornby, A. S.(1954). A Guide to Patterns and Usage in English[M]. London: OUP.

Hunston, S. (2004). ‘Counting the uncountable: problems of identifying evaluation in a text and in a corpus’[J]. Corpora and Discourse,(9), 157-188.

Hunston, S. (2011). Corpus Approaches to Evaluation: Phraseology and Evaluative Language [M]. New York: Routledge.

Hunston, S.&Sinclair, J. (2000). A local grammar of evaluation [A]. In Hunston,S.&G. Thompson (eds.) . Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse [C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hyland, K. & Tse, P. (2005). “Hooking the reader: A corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts”[J]. English for Specific Purposes, 24 (2), 123–139.

Hyland, K. (2001). Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic articles[J]. Written Communication. 18(4), 549-574.

Jiang, FK & Hyland, K. (2017). ‘Metadiscursive nouns: interaction and cohesion in abstract moves’ [J]. English for Specific Purposes,(46), 1-14.

Kaltenböck, G. (2005). It-extraposition in English: a functional view[J]. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics. (10), 119-159.

Larsson, T. & Kaatari, H. (2019). Extraposition in learner and expert writing: Exploring (in)formality and the impact of register[J]. International Journal of Learner Corpus Linguistics, 5(91), 33-62.

Larsson, T. (2016). The introductory it pattern: variability explored in learner and expert writing. [J]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. (22), 64-79.

Larsson, T. (2017). A functional classification of the introductory it pattern: investigating academic writing by non-native-speaker and native-speaker students[J]. English for Specific Purposes. (48), 57-70.

Larsson, T. (2018). Is there a correlation between form and function? A syntactic and functional investigation of the introductory it pattern in student writing[J]. ICAME Journal, 42(1), 13-40.

Larsson, T. (2019). Grammatical stance marking across registers: Revisiting the formal-informal dichotomy[J]. Register Studies, 1(2), 234-268.

Lemke, J. L. (1998). Resources for attitudinal meaning: evaluative orientations in text semantics[J]. Functions of Language, 5(1), 33-56.

Martin, J.& White, P. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English [M]. London/New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.

Matalene, C. (1985). Contrastive rhetoric: An American writing teacher in China[J]. College English, 47(8), 789-808.

Orr, S., & Ariel, M. (2021). Predicating Truth: an empirically based analysis[J]. Journal of Pragmatics. (185), 131-145.

Peacock, M. (2011). A comparative study of introductory it in research articles across eight disciplines. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(1), 72-100 .

Pérez Blanco, M. (2020). Evidential adjectives in English and Spanish journalistic opinion discourse[J]. Journal of Pragmatics. (170), 112-124.

Pérez-Paredes, P. & Bueno-Alastuey, M. C. (2019). A corpus-driven analysis of certainty stance adverbs: Obviously, really and actually in spoken native and learner English.[J]. Journal of Pragmatics. (140), 22-32.

Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum., G. Leech&J. Svartvik. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language[M]. London: Longman.

Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stotesbury, H. (2003). “Evaluation in research article abstracts in the narrative and hard sciences”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2 (4), 327–341.

Wang, Z. et al. (2022). Lexical Input in the Grammatical Expression of Stance: A Collexeme Analysis of the INTRODUCTORY IT PATTERN[J]. Frontiers in Psychology. 12, 762000.

Zhang, G. (2015). It is suggested that . or it is better to .? Forms and meanings of subject it-extraposition in academic and popular writing[J]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. (20), 11-13.

Zhou, H., and Chen, M. (2021). What still needs to be noted: pseudo-cleft in the academic discourse of applied linguistics[J]. Frontiers in Psychology. 12, 672349.

LOU Baocui & WANG Mimi(2021). A Comparative Corpus-based Study of Lexical Bundles in Journal Articles Written by Chinese and International Science Scholars[J]. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching, (6): 30-41.

WANG Bingxin & WEI Naixing(2018).Characteristic Evaluative it Patterns and Meanings in Research Articles by Chinese and Western Scholars: A Contrastive Study[J].Foreign Languages And Their Teaching, (6) : 53-64.

ZHANG Le & WEI Naixing(2013). Patterns and Functions of Textual Sentence Stems in Research Articles, [J].Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, (2) : 8-15.

ZHANG Jidong & XI Longjin.(2016). Research on the Evaluation Orientation in Social Science Academic Discourse-- Taking it v-link ADJ that/to-inf type as an example[J]. Journal of Xi’an International Studies University, (1): 40-45.

ZHANG Lei & WEI Naixing.(2017). A Contrastive Study of the Local Grammar Patterns of Evaluation in Academic Research Articles across Western and Chinese Scholars[J]. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, (3):10-18+159.