On the Concept of Temperament by Rudolf Herman Lotze
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202503_8(3).0025Keywords:
External Nature, Temperament, Gender Differences, Moral Development.Abstract
In the grand symphony of human mind and moral law, Rudolf Herman Lotze’s theory of temperament, with its profound insights and unique perspective, reveals the intricate connection between temperament and moral development. Lotze deeply understood that a person’s inner qualities and emotional inclinations are like a hidden spring, serving not only as the secret driving force behind behavior but also as the solid foundation of moral development. By delving into the subtle influences of external nature, the evolution of civilization, and the foundations of human physiology and psychology, he explored how these factors subtly shape temperament and emphasized the central role of temperament in moral cognition, judgment, and behavior. Lotze was well aware that the perfection of morality is not merely a simple expression of natural inclinations, but requires the refinement of time and the nourishment of culture to fully shine. True moral behavior originates from an individual’s free will and deep spiritual pursuit. This perspective provides an important balance between freedom and responsibility in contemporary society. Lotze reminds us that in pursuing technological and material progress, we should not overlook the inner freedom and happiness of individuals. By deeply understanding and practicing Lotze’s theory of temperament, we can promote the profound development of individuals and the harmonious unity of morality in the complex social environment, thereby continuously advancing on the path of moral cultivation.
Downloads
References
[1] Rudolf Hermann Lotze. Mikrokosmos: Ideen zur Naturgeschichte und Geschichte der Menschheit. Versuch einer Anthropologie, S.391-392, Felix Meiner Verlag GmbH, Hamburg, 2017.
[2] Herodotus. The Histories. Translated by A. D. Godley, Harvard University Press, 1920, Vol1, P.328-329.
[3] Sapir, Edward. Culture, Language, and Society. University of California Press, 1924, p. 78.
[4] Atkinson, R. Environmental Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989, p.45.
[5] Mead, G. H. Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934, p.162-180.
[6] Rudolf Hermann Lotze. Mikrokosmos: Ideen zur Naturgeschichte und Geschichte der Menschheit. Versuch einer Anthropologie, S.363-364, Felix Meiner Verlag GmbH, Hamburg, 2017.
[7] Masten, A. S. Ordinary Magic: Resilience Processes in Development. American Psychologist, 2001, Vol.56(3), p.227-238.
[8] Rudolf Hermann Lotze. Mikrokosmos:Ideen zur Naturgeschichte und Geschichte der Menschheit. Versuch einer Anthropologie, S.370, Felix Meiner Verlag GmbH, Hamburg, 2017.
[9] James, W. The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. Longmans, Green, and Company, 1902, p. 381.
[10] Kant, I. Critique of Practical Reason. Translated by T. K. Abbott. London: Longmans, Green, and Co, 1788, p.47.
[11] Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature. London: John Noon, 1740.Vol. III, Part II, Sect. III, p. 297.
[12] Bentham, J. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: T. Payne and Son, 1789. p.72.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Social Science and Education Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.



