Algorithm-Driven Identity Politics: Role of Social Media in Polarisation and Mobilisation

Yue Zhang

doi:10.54691/p2wv0f03

Authors

Yue Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/p2wv0f03

Keywords:

Recommendation Algorithms; Filter Bubbles; Information Cocoons; Disinformation; Identity Politics; Mimetic Environments; Cultural Capital; Group Identity; Social Fragmentation; Digital Public Sphere.

Abstract

This is an essay that explores the role of recommendation algorithms in the communication of identity politics and their sociological and political implications, focusing on how the phenomena of filter bubbles and information cocoons reshape users' information exposure and cognitive structures. By combining Baudrillard's theory of mimetic environments, Bourdieu's theory of cultural capital, and Mead's theory of symbolic interaction, the article reveals how recommender algorithms reinforce group identities and exacerbate social divisions through selective pushing of information. In addition, the proliferation of disinformation exhibits higher dissemination efficiency in algorithm-driven environments, posing challenges to the openness and inclusiveness of the public sphere. The article calls for multi-dimensional interventions in technological design, policy regulation and public education to mitigate the masking effect of algorithmic communication and the negative impact of disinformation, and to provide solution paths for building a pluralistic and open digital public sphere. This article aims to provide theoretical support for understanding the double-edged sword effect of recommendation algorithms in identity politics and practical suggestions for the governance and optimisation of digital society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Fukuyama, F. (2018). Identity: The demand for dignity and the politics of resentment. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

[2] Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-768.

[3] Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin UK.

[4] Clark, R. (2016). “Hope in a hashtag”: The discursive activism of #WhyIStayed. Feminist Media Studies, 16(5), 788-804.

[5] Sunstein, C. R. (2018). Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.

[6] Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151.

[7] Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (T. Burger & F. Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

[8] Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

[9] Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press.

[10] Bimber, B. (1998). The Internet and political mobilization. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association (pp. 45-67), Boston, MA.

[11] Cheney-Lippold, J. (2017). We are data: Algorithms and the making of our digital selves. NYU Press.

[12] Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

[13] Van Bavel, J. J., Rathje, S., Harris, E., Robertson, C., & Sternisko, A. (2021). How social media shapes polarization. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(11), 913-916.

[14] Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

[15] Mao, Z., & Zhang, J. (2024). Mirror, toy, bridge: A study on the constructive mechanism of algorithmic identity. Chinese Journal of Journalism and Communication Studies, (03), 144–163.

[16] Li, F. Information cocoon, rabble and opinion bias: A study of the phenomenon of opinion polarisation in online communities[J]. Journalism Research Guide,2022,13(12):19-21.

[17] Wang, Y. (2024). The impact of short video platform algorithm recommendations on user emotions. New Media and Society, 18(1), 20–36.

[18] Wu, Y., & Li, F. (2022). Selective exposure in algorithmic environments: The impact of recommendation systems on user perceptions. Media Studies Quarterly, 48(1), 98-115.

[19] Kim, J., & Kokuryo, J. (2024). The role of networked narratives in amplifying or mitigating biases: A case study of YouTube. Journal of Communication Research, 51(2), 123-145.

[20] Zhao, Y., & Wang, H. (2023). A study on the "framing effect" in mass emotion dissemination. Editorial Friend, (07), 53–59.

[21] Zhou, J. (2021). Social group mediatization and its impact on international politics. Modern International Relations, (02), 31–37, +22.

[22] Gerbaudo, P. (2018). Social media and populism: An interview on the role of networked narratives. Journal of Communication Research, 41(4), 321-335.

[23] Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society: The information age: Economy, society, and culture (Vol. 1). Wiley-Blackwell.

[24] Chueca Del Cerro, C. (2024). The power of social networks and social media’s filter bubble in shaping polarisation: An agent-based model. Applied Network Science, 9(69).

[25] Baudrillard, J. (1983). Simulacra and simulation. University of Michigan Press.

[26] Yao, J., Sun, W., & Wang, Z. (2024). Four dimensions of algorithmic recommendation "obscuring" mainstream ideology and response strategies. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (Social Sciences Edition), 1–9. Advance online publication.

[27] Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. University of Chicago Press.

[28] Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.

[29] Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychological Science, 26(10), 1531-