Develop effective incentives for employees through motivation theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v20i.1082Keywords:
ERG theory; motivation measures; goal-setting theoryAbstract
Motivation incentive mechanism refers to the sum of the interaction between the incentive subject and the incentive object through incentive factors or incentive means in the organizational system, that is, the sum of the internal relationship structure, operation mode, and development and evolution law of enterprise incentive. Under the modern enterprise system, to give full play to the enthusiasm of employees, it is necessary to adopt an incentive mechanism, so that they can realize their value in the process of creating for the enterprise so that their enthusiasm and creativity will be more full play and develop. Therefore, the establishment of a motivation incentive mechanism will enable enterprises to maintain strong momentum of development. Stimulating internal and external motivation of employees by different management methods, formulating motivation measures according to ERG theory, and setting motivation goals for the team by using goal-setting theory. These methods can successfully motivate team members to complete their tasks to a certain extent.
Downloads
References
Aldag, R.J. & Brief, Arthur P., (1979). Task design and employee motivation, Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman.
Akın, Zafer & Karagözoğlu, Emin, (2017). The Role of Goals and Feedback in Incentivizing Performance. Managerial and decision economics, 38(2), pp.193–211.
Alderfer, C.P., (1972). Existence, relatedness, and growth; human needs in organizational settings, New York: Free Press.
Comeau, Gilles et al., (2019). The Motivation for Learning Music (MLM) questionnaire: Assessing children’s and adolescents’ autonomous motivation for learning a musical instrument. Motivation and emotion, 43(5), pp.705–718.
Gagné, Marylène & Deci, Edward L, (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of organizational behavior, 26(4), pp.331–362.
Leanna Lawter, Richard E. Kopelman, & David J. Prottas. (2015). McGregor's Theory X/Y and Job Performance: A Multilevel, Multi-source Analysis. Journal of Managerial Issues, 27(1/4), 84-101.
Locke, EA, & Latham, GP (eds) (2012), New Developments in Goal Setting and Task Performance, Taylor & Francis Group, London. Available from: ProQuest Ebook Central. [18 December 2020].
Maslow, A. (1943) A Theory of Human Motivation, Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.
McInerney, D. M. (2019). Motivation. Educational Psychology (Dorchester-on-Thames), 39(4), 427-429.
Pulasinghage, C., 2010. Employee Motivation: What Factors Motivate Employees to Work in Nongovernmental Organizations (NGO) in Sri Lanka: A Study According to Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Model. The international journal of interdisciplinary social sciences, 5(4), pp.197–212.
Sosik, John J, Chun, Jae Uk, Blair, Anthony L, & Fitzgerald, Natalie A. (2013). Possible Selves in the Lives of Transformational Faith Community Leaders. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 5(4), 283-293.
Sansone, C. & Harackiewicz, Judith M, (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation the search for optimal motivation and performance, San Diego: Academic Press.
Sorensen, Peter F & Minahan, Matt, 2011. McGregor's legacy: the evolution and current application of Theory Y management. Journal of management history (2006), 17(2), pp.178–192.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
