Implicit and explicit attitudes towards rich and poor people
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v20i.1083Keywords:
implicit, explicit; social attitudes; social classAbstract
In modern society, people’s social economic status (SES) can be determined whether individuals are wealthy or poor. Many research indicated that people tend to believe rich people exerted positive impact to the society, in contrast poor people are negative. According to certain research, individual’s mentality can be tested by implicit and explicit social attitudes. (8. Greenwald & Banaji, 1995; Greenwald, Nosek, & Banaji, 2003). Specifically refer to individual’s social background, races and ages etc. People especially adults reflected positive evaluation on rich over poor implicitly. But explicitly the result is opposite, individual’s SES can be decisive as well. Nevertheless, implicit and explicit social attitudes can juggle to determine different races as well. (Pro-white and Anti-black). Nowadays people tend to judge things based on their objective thoughts and circumstances they are under. Therefore, I believe the social tendency for future study might possibly changed by the development of the world. I am also really intriguing of future research on people’s attitudes on everything that are associated to them
Downloads
References
Cuddy, A. J., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in experimental social psychology, 40, 61-149.
Johnson, M. A., Stevenson, R. M., & Letwin, C. R. (2018). A woman's place is in the… startup! Crowdfunder judgments, implicit bias, and the stereotype content model. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(6), 813-831.
Tian, Y., Yang, J., & Chuenterawong, P. (2021). Share or not? Effects of Stereotypes on Social Media Engagement Using the Stereotype Content Model. Journalism Practice, 1-27.
Lee, T. L., & Fiske, S. T. (2006). Not an outgroup, not yet an ingroup: Immigrants in the stereotype content model. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(6), 751-768.
Bargh, J. A. (1999). The cognitive monster: The case against the controllability of automatic stereotype effects.
Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., & Beach, K. R. (2001). Implicit and explicit attitudes: Examination of the relationship between measures of intergroup bias. Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes, 4, 175-197.
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology.
Greenwald & Banaji, 1995; Greenwald, Nosek, & Banaji, 2003. The development of Implicit Attitudes.
Greenwald & Banaji, 1998; Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test.
Rashmita, Christia, Elizabeth, Kriby 2015; Childhood Wealth Inequality in the United States: Implications for Social Stratification and Well-Being
Zhou and Wang (2007); DISSOCIATION BETWEEN IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT ATTITUDES TOWARDS THE RICH IN A DEVELOPING COUNTRY: THE CASE OF CHINA
Horwitz and Dovidio (2015); The rich—love them or hate them? Divergent implicit and explicit attitudes toward the wealthy
Baron & Banaji 2006; Qian et al., 2016; Implicit Racial Biases in Preschool Children and Adults from Asia and Africa
Dunham, Baron, and Banaji (2006); From American City to Japanese Village: A Cross-Cultural Investigation of Implicit Race Attitudes
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
