The Impact of ‘institution-governance’ configuration on the Ambidextrous innovation of platform enterprises——Qualitative Comparative Analysis based on Fuzzy Set (fsQCA)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v20i.1085Keywords:
Institutional environment; Corporate governance; Ambidextrous innovation; Platform enterprise; Fuzzy sets Qualitative comparative analysis.Abstract
Based on the system theory and principal-agent theory, the project choice of China's 95 platform enterprises as the research object, based on the comprehensive analysis of internal and external environment, consider the external institutional factors, internal governance structure optimization, select "system management" because of conditions before the configuration, using the fuzzy qualitative comparative analysis study on causal configuration (fsQCA), Further explore the role and influence mechanism of this conditional configuration in ambidextrous innovation activities of platform enterprises.It is found that board capital in internal governance factor and intellectual property protection in external institutional factor are the core conditions for high exploratory innovation behavior.For high development innovation behavior, the core conditions of high development innovation behavior are ownership concentration degree of internal governance factors, incentive mechanism and tax incentive of external governance factors.
Downloads
References
Yang W, Liu J, Wu J. The impact of population-flow configuration on core firm performance: an empirical study of artificial intelligence digital innovation ecosystem [J]. Studies in science of science,2020,38(11):2077-2086.]
Weng Zhigang, Tang Yuanmao, ZHANG Ping. Research on channel innovation performance transmission and dynamic mechanism: Based on Panel Data of Chinese listed banks from 2007 to 2013 [J]. Nankai management review,2015,18(05):110-121.
Fu Binghai, Xie Fuji, Han Yuqing. Innovation chain resource integration, ambidextrous innovation and innovation performance: an empirical study based on Changdelta new ventures [J]. China Soft Science,2015(12):176-186.
Li Hua. Research progress and Framework of Ambidextrous Innovation [A]. Chinese Society of Management Modernization. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Management Science and Technology [C] / / Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Management Science and Technology. Chinese Society of Management Modernization: Chinese Society of Management Modernization,2010:9
Lu Tong, Dang Yin. Financial review,2014,6(04):1-17+123. (in Chinese)
Ma Weihong. An empirical study on the impact of tax incentives on technological innovation of high-tech enterprises [D]. Nanjing University of Finance and Economics,2012.
Yin Zhifeng, Ye Jingyi, Huang Yanghua, Qin Xuezheng. Intellectual property rights protection and firm innovation: transmission mechanism and its test [J]. World economy,2013,36(12):111-129.
Ma Weihong. An empirical study on the impact of tax incentives and government subsidies on R&D investment: Based on the panel data of listed high-tech enterprises [J]. Science and technology progress and countermeasures,2011,28(17):111-114.
Liu Fang, Yang Zheng, Yang Xi. Institutional environment, tax incentives and firm innovation investment [J]. Management review,2016,28(02):61-73.
Du Yun zhou, Jia Liangding. Configuration Perspective and Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): A new way of management Research [J]. Management World,2017(06):155-167.]
Su Yi, AN Xiaoli, WANG Xinhuan, Lei Jiasu. Research on the impact of human capital input on regional innovation performance: Based on the threshold regression of intellectual property rights protection system [J]. Science research, 2017, 35 (5) : 771-781. The DOI: 10.16192 / j.carol carroll nki. 1003-2053.2017.05.015.
Xing Fei, Zhou Taiyun. R&d subsidies, intellectual property protection and enterprise innovation [J]. Chinese BBS of science and technology, 2020 (9) : 114-124. The DOI: 10.13580 / j.carol carroll nki FSTC. 2020.09.018.
Wang hua. Will tougher ipr protection help technological innovation?[J]. Economic research journal,2011,46(S2):124-135.
Wu Chaopeng, Tang Di. Intellectual property law enforcement, technological innovation and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese listed companies [J]. Economic research journal,2016,51(11):125-139.]
Wang Suikun, HAO Jiwei. Research on the relationship between government subsidies, taxation and r&d innovation performance: Based on empirical evidence of listed enterprises in Shenzhen Sme Board [J]. Science and technology progress and countermeasures,2014,31(09):92-96.
Zheng Chunmei, Li Pei. The impact of government subsidies and tax incentives on enterprise innovation performance: an empirical study of high-tech enterprises in the Growth Enterprise Market [J]. Science and technology progress and countermeasures,2015,32(16):83-87.
Zhang Jie, Chen Zhiyuan, Yang Lianxing, Xin Fu. Performance evaluation of China's innovation subsidy policy: Theory and evidence [J]. Economic research institute,2015,50(10):4-17+33.]
Chen Hong, ZHANG Yu, Liu Dongxia. Government subsidies, tax incentives and firm innovation performance: an empirical study of different life cycle stages [J]. Nankai management review,2019,22(03):187-200.]
Niu Jianbo, Li Wei 'an. Journal of management science,2020,33(04):3-18.
Yang Yong, DA Qingli, ZHOU Qin. Science of Science and Technology Management,2007(11):61-65. (in Chinese)
Tao Qiuyan, Li Rui, Wang Yonggui. The relationship between the intensity of different stakeholder relationships and innovation performance in innovation networks: An empirical analysis based on QCA [J]. Science and technology management research,2016,36(09):1-5.]
Wang Lihong, GU Qinxuan. The impact of organizational intangible capital on the ability of breakthrough and incremental innovation: An empirical study [J]. Science & technology management,2013,34(10):152-160.]
Shi Dongwei and Wang Xia, Human Capital, Product Market Competition and Net Cash Flow of the Board of Directors. Friends of Accounting, 2017(16): 64-68.
Ma Lili, Liao Jingwen, Chen Rongshow. The impact of technical directors and equity incentive on firm innovation efficiency [J]. Progress and countermeasures of science and technology,2020,37(21):82-90.]
Wang Yanni. The impact of executive incentives on r&d investment: A case study of Listed manufacturing companies in China [J]. Research in science,2011,29(07):1071-1078
Li Wenjing, Zheng Manni. Substantive or strategic innovation?Economic research journal,2016,51(04):60-73.
PENG Zhengyin, Wu Xiaojuan. Research on the evolution of legitimacy acquisition of platform enterprises under institutional Pressure: A Case study of didi Out Behavior [J]. Business Economics and Management,2019(04):58-70.]
Li Deqiang, PENG Can, Xi Lei. The impact of dynamic competence on innovation synergy: The moderating role of environmental competitiveness [J]. Operations research and management,2017,26(09):183-192.
Yang Fei, AN Liren, Shi Beibei. Research context and future prospect of knowledge accumulation and innovation [J]. Science and technology management research,2017,37(11):136-140.]
Xi Lei, PENG Can, Yang Hong. The impact of capital pooling on the synergy of ambidextrous innovation: A Case study of Environmental Dynamics [J]. Technology economics,2017,36(04):1-5+62.
BI Xiaofang, ZHAI Shuping, JIANG Baoqiang. The impact of government subsidies and financial redundancy on ambidextrous innovation of high-tech enterprises [J]. Accounting Research,2017(01):46-52+95.
Chen Donghua, Chen Xinyuan, WAN Hualin. Wage regulation and In-service consumption in State-owned enterprises. Economic Research Journal, 2005, (2): 92-101.]
Wu Liansheng. State-owned equity, tax incentives and corporate tax burden [J]. Economic research journal,2009,44(10):109-120.
Zhuang Ziyin, Jia Hongjing, Li Xun. Research on the impact of intellectual property protection on firm innovation: From the perspective of firm heterogeneity [J]. Nankai Management Review :1-22[2022-03-14].
Schaefer, R., Schaefer, R., Et al. Intellectual property rights, firm heterogeneity, and innovation: Evidence from China's manufacturing industry [J]. Finance Research,2013(08):136-149.]
Zhang Ming, Du Yunzhou. The application of QCA method in organizational and management research: Orientation, Strategy and direction [J]. Chinese journal of management,2019,16(09): 1312-1323.
Li Xi. Research on the Relationship between Enterprise Innovation Network Characteristics, Absorptive Capacity and enterprise innovation [D]. South China University of Technology,2015.
Peng Xiaobao, Zhang Jia, Liu Guofang, Liu Jiaojiao. The relationship between institutional pressure and entrepreneurial willingness to innovate: the moderating role of leadership style [J]. Science and technology progress and countermeasures,2018,35(16):83-90.]
Heimans, J., & Timms, H. (2014). Understanding "New power" : The Crowd is Challenging traditional Leadership. Here's How to Harness Its Energy. Harvard Business Review, 92(12).
Evans, P., & Gawer, A. (2016). The Rise of the Platform Enterprise: A Global Survey.
BENNER M J,TUSHMAN M L. Exploitation,exploration,and process management: The productivity dilemma revisi-ted [J]. Academy of management review,2003,28(2):238-256.
BENNER M J,TUSHMAN M L. Exploitation,exploration,and process management: The productivity dilemma revisi-ted [J]. Academy of management review,2003,28(2):238-256.
Guellec, D., & Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. van. (2003). From R&D to Productivity Growth: Do The Institutional Setting and The Source of Funds of R&D Matter? IIR Working Paper.
Kaiser, U., & Wright, J. (2006, January 1). Price structure in two-sided markets: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 24(1), 1 -- 28.
Gawer, A. (2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, 43(7), 1239-1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006
Boudreau, K. J., & Jeppesen, L. B. (2015). Unpaid crowd complementors: The platform network effect mirage. Strategic Management Journal, 36 (12). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2324
O 'Sullivan, G. (2000). Technology Education and Industry Links: Future of Repackaged Past? Education Through Technology, 1.
Belloc, F. (2012). Corporate Governance and Innovation: A Survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26 (5), 835-864. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2011.00681.x
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
David, P. A., & Hall, B. H. (2000). Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy, 29(4/5), 497. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333 (99) 00087-6
Dominique Guellec and Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie. Applications, grants and the value of patent[J]. Economics Letters, 2000, 69(1) : 109-114.
Amy J. Hillman and Thomas Dalziel. Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: Integrating Agency and Resource Dependence Perspectives[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 2003, 28(3) : 383-396.
Anna Grandori and Giuseppe Soda, "Inter-firm Networks: Antecedents, Mechanisms and Forms, "Organization Studies, Vol. 16,No. 2, 1995, pp.183-214.
Terry Shevlin. Taxes and Off-Balance-Sheet Financing: Research and Development Limited Partnerships[J]. The Accounting Review, 1987, 62(3) : 480-509
Ragins, B. R. (2008). Disclosure disconnects: antecedents and consequences of disclosing invisible stigmas across life domains. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 194.
Holt, D. (2020). Cultural Innovation: The secret to building breakthrough businesses. Harvard Business Review, 98(5), 106.
Wagemann, C., Schneider, C. Q., & Carsten Q. Schneider and Claudius Wagemann. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences : a guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
