Ownership Concentration, Regional Differences and Corporate Financialization

Authors

  • Mengqi Yan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v21i.1180

Keywords:

Ownership concentration, Regional differences, Corporate financialization

Abstract

Does the increase in the shareholding ratio of shareholders promote or inhibit the degree of corporate financialization, or does it have other relationships? This paper selects the data of listed companies of non-financial enterprises in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2008 to 2020, and uses the least squares method to test whether the ownership concentration has an impact on the degree of financialization of enterprises. whether there is a regional effect. The study found that, regardless of the region where the company is located, there is a positive U-shaped relationship between ownership concentration and corporate financialization. The concentration of ownership has an inhibitory effect on the degree of corporate financialization. Therefore, although a moderate degree of ownership concentration will inhibit the degree of financialization of enterprises, differences between regions should be considered when conducting corporate financialization governance. The eastern region should abandon the oppression of the real economy caused by the accumulation of financial resources, and the western region strengthens the institutional environment. Construction and optimization of financial asset allocation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Du Yong, Xie Jin, Chen Jianying. CEO's financial background and the financialization of real enterprises [J]. China Industrial Economy, 2019(05): 136- 154.

Gong Guangming, Xiao Bingyu. Directors with overseas background and the financialization of real enterprises [J]. Industrial Technology Economy, 2020(09): 121-129.

Gu Leilei, Guo Jianluan, Wang Hongyu. Corporate Social Responsibility, Financing Constraints and Corporate Financialization [J]. Financial Research, 2020 (02): 109-127.

Lei Xintu, Zhu Rongcheng, Huang Yingying. Research on the degree of corporate financialization, inducing factors and economic consequences [J]. East China Economic Management, 2020 (01): 76-85.

Peng Yuchao, Han Xun, Li Jianjun. Economic Policy Uncertainty and Corporate Financialization [J]. China Industrial Economics, 2018(01): 137-155.

Sun Hongfeng, Liu Chang. Synchronization of corporate financialization and stock price[J]. investment research, 2020(08): 124-141.

Wu Qiusheng, Wang Wenwen, Shangguan Zeming. Tax reduction and fee reduction and the financialization inhibition of real enterprises--Also on the moderating effect of the effectiveness of internal control [J]. Financial Research, 2021(05): 55-65.

Xiao Zhongyi, Lin Lin. Corporate Financialization, Life Cycle and Continuous Innovation——An Empirical Study Based on Industry Classification [J]. Finance and Economics Research 2019(08): 43-57

Xu Li, Wang Huan. Research on the peer effect of financialization of Chinese enterprises [J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, 2021(04): 25- 33+53.

Yu Lianchao, Zhang Weiguo, Sui Xin, etc. Military experience of senior executives and corporate financialization: inhibit or promote? [J]. Scientific Decision,2019(06): 20-42.

Yu Nutao, Zhang Huayu, Liu Hao. Non-controlling major shareholders and corporate financialization: Reservoir or arbitrage tool? [J]. Nankai Management Review,2021(01): 1-33.

Sun L, Liang Y, Wen X. The Financialization of Entity Enterprises and Audit Fees[J]. E3S Web of Conferences,2020(2-3): 01-06.

Cai Y P, Chen H Q. The Impact of the Financialization of Entity Enterprises on the Value of Enterprises[J]. The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics,2019(03): 24-31.

Yong D U, Zhang H, Chen J Y. The Impact of Financialization on Future Development of Real Enterprises' Core Business: Promotion or Inhibition[J]. china industrial economics, 2017(12): 113-131.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-20

How to Cite

Yan, M. (2022). Ownership Concentration, Regional Differences and Corporate Financialization. BCP Business & Management, 21, 73-81. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v21i.1180