Analysis on Pinduoduo Business Model and Future Development Strategy based on Sinking Market

Authors

  • Nie Cheng
  • Xinyu Huang
  • Jing Qian

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v16i.312

Keywords:

Business model analysis, case study, moat theory, Pinduoduo

Abstract

This paper analyses Pinduoduo's success and make suggestions to help it further improve its business model for the long term and provide a reference experience of similar e-commerce companies by using moat theory.  In the long run, the competitiveness of its competitors in the same industry cannot be underestimated. In the current situation, Pinduoduo's moat is weak in terms of intangible assets and user conversion costs due to the poor quality of most of the products on its platform and that its primary users are price-sensitive users. In this context, the authors give following suggestions for its future development: 1. Highlight brand characteristics and ensure product quality 2. Create differentiated competitive advantages 3. Improve supply chain structure and back-end service system 4. Refined operation of existing users and stop blindly expand users.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Timmers, P., & Iii, D. Focus Theme Business Models for Electronic Markets.

Hedman, J., & Kalling, T. The business model concept: theoretical underpinnings and empirical illustrations.

Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2010). The business model: theoretical roots, recent developments, and future research. Iese Research Papers, 37(4), 1019-1042.

Hamel, G. (2001). Leading the revolution: Strategy & Leadership.

Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Ricart, J. E.. (2010). From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 195-215.

Zhong genshen, & Sun Xiaojing. (2006). Six perspectives and integration of business model research. Dongyue's Treatise, 27(002), 120-124.

Yuan Lei. (2007). Reconstruction of business model system. Chinese industrial economy (06), 70-79.

Weng junyi. (2004). Business model innovation. Economic Management Publishing House.

Yuan Lei. (2008). Research on business model classification. Chinese soft science.

Wei wei, Zhu Wuxiang, & Lin Guiping. (2012). Business model theory based on stakeholder transaction structure. management world, 000(012), 125-131.

Yao Mingming, Wu Xiaobo, Shi Yongjiang, Rong Ke, & Lei Linan. (2014). Matching business model design and technology innovation strategy from the perspective of technology catch-up: A multi-case study. management world, 000(010), 149-162.

Hu haibo. (2015). E-commerce business model innovation under the "Internet +" environment. Corporate research, 000(005), 21-23.

Verburg, & Peter. (2004). Belly up to the buffett buffet. Canadian Business, 77(10), 33-33.

Tan Mengtong. (2018). Buffett's Moat: Finding a moat for investment funds. Investment and Finance, 000(002), 40-40.

Cao Zheng, Li Runfa, & LAN Xue. Consumption driving and development strategy of e-commerce giants sinking market -- A Case study of Alibaba, JINGdong and Pinduoduo. Research on Business Economics (8), 3.

Christensen, C. M. The Innovator's Dilemma. Harvard Business School Press.

Jin Zhiyong. (2020). Research on Pinduoduo enterprise Strategy from the perspective of innovation. Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

Fang Wen. (2019). Pinduoduo in painful transformation. Corporate Observer, 000(002), 76-78.

Wang Jie. (2019). Analysis of pinduoduo development status and future prospects. Marketing (19), 25+27.

Cui Guilin (2020-05-18). The moat of Pinduoduo. Economic Observer,020.

Chen Weiru, & Yu Zhuoxuan. (2013). Platform Strategy: The Business Model revolution sweeping the world. CITIC Publishing House.

Hui-wen Chen. Research on Value Creation based on "Social + E-commerce" Business Model: A Case study of "PDD". (Doctoral dissertation, Harbin University of Commerce).

Downloads

Published

2021-12-26

How to Cite

Cheng, N., Huang, X., & Qian, J. (2021). Analysis on Pinduoduo Business Model and Future Development Strategy based on Sinking Market. BCP Business & Management, 16, 278-286. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v16i.312