Countermeasures for spatial governance of cross-district scenic byway: A case of Chengde National No. 1 Scenic Byway, China

Ting Wang; Jiawen He; He Zhu

doi:10.54691/bcpbm.v21i.1250

Authors

Ting Wang
Jiawen He
He Zhu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v21i.1250

Keywords:

Cross-district, Scenic byway, Spatial governance, National No. 1 Scenic Byway, Chengde, China

Abstract

Scenic byway is a new corridor cross administrative region spatial carrier with complex functions of transportation, ecology, recreation, and culture. The large spatial span makes Scenic byway face governance problems such as crossing Administrative Region institutional barriers. Through literature review, on-the-spot investigation, induction and summary, this paper finds that cross-district scenic byways have: (1) The characteristics of giant corridor form, multi-level spatial elements, two-dimensional spatial management scale and multiple spatial subjects. (2) The development and protection of multi type resources, the game of management power, and the unclear division of rights, responsibilities, and interests among multi-subject. (3) Cross region, cross department, cross subject and other multicategory "cross-border" Governance Dilemma. By introducing the concept of space governance, the principles, objectives, subjects, and contents of Scenic byway governance across administrative regions are clarified based on the logic of "problem objective countermeasure", and the space governance system with the sub objectives of "consensus system of Space justice", "space platform-based management and control process" and "consultation mechanism of space community" is attempted to be constructed. Taking the "National No. 1 Scenic Byway" in Chengde as an example, put forward such countermeasures as legislation and regulation, building a composite space consensus system, establishing a control process, clarifying space powers, and establishing a multi-subject negotiation mechanism, to achieve the goal of cross administrative Scenic byway space governance through a set of laws and regulations, a set of control processes, and a set of mechanisms. In order to provide a research perspective for the spatial governance paradigm of scenic byways across administrative regions, and provide a practical basis for the proposed coordinated development strategy of typical corridor spatial regions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbar, K. F., Hale, W. H. G., & Headley, A.D. (2003). Assessment of scenic beauty of the roadside vegetation in northern England. Landscape and Urban Planning, 63(3), 139-144.

Blumentrath, C., & Tveit, M. S. (2014). Visual characteristics of roads: A literature review of people's perception and Norwegian design practice. Transportation Research Part A Policy & Practice, 59, 58-71.

Cao, X. S. (2019). Geogovernance of national land use based on coupled human and natural systems. Journal of Natural Resources, 34(10), 2051-2059.

Chen, L., & Jiang, H. (2019). From land resource advantageous areas allocation to main functional areas management: a logical framework of territorial space governance. China Land Science, 33(6), 10-17.

Chen, R. L., & Liu, Y. P. (2013). Regional governance research: an international comparative perspective. Beijing: Central Compilation & Translation Press.

Chen, Y. (2015). Designing the Game: A new pattern of spatial governance toward the sharing of land development rights. City Planning Review, 39(11), 78-84, 91.

Duan, X. J., Zou, H., Chen, W. X., & Min, M. (2019). The concept, assessment and control zoning theory and method of waterfront resources: Taking the resources along the Yangtze River as an example. Journal of Natural Resources, 34(10), 2209-2222.

Fan, J. (2017). Perspective of China’s spatial governance system after 19th CPC National Congress. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 32(4), 396-404.

Federal Highway Administration. (2011). National Scenic Byway. Beta Script Publishing.

Gui, Y. L. (2019). The current situation, dilemma, and way of trans-administrative land space governance -- taking the airport economic zone of the capital as an example. Beijing Planning Review, 2, 52-58.

Guo, S. Y., & Zhao, D. H. (2020). A systematic analysis of Xi Jinping’s important expositions on spatial justice. Journal of Systems Science, 28(3), 24-28.

Guo, Y., & Cheng, W. H. (2010). Measuring governance level of Chinese localities: empirical study in five Chinese cities. Urban Studies, 12, 113-118.

Huang, J. L., & Chen, J. F. (2017). The 'Tao' of spatial governance: Enlightenment of urban planning by Lao Zi. City Planning Review, 41(4), 2226, 48.

Joseph, E. M. (2003). The socio-economic and environmental impacts of tourism development on the Okavango Delta, north-western Botswana. Journal of Arid Environments, 54, 447-467.

Klein, L. R., Hendrix, W. G., Lahr, V. I., Jolie, B., Kaytes, B., Rodney, D., Sayler, D., Mark, E., Swanson, D., William, J., Elliot, E., John, P., & Reganold, F. (2015). Linking ecology and aesthetics in sustainable agricultural landscapes: Lessons from the Palouse region of Washington, U.S.A. Landscape & Urban Planning, 134, 195-209.

Kong, Y., Zhen, F., Li, Z. Z., & Fu, X. X. (2019). Research on smart technology-assisted territorial spatial planning: A case study at city and county level. Journal of Natural Resources, 34(10), 2186-2199.

Kooiman, J. (1993). Governance and governability: Using complexity, dynamics, and diversity. Modern Governance: New Government – Society Interactions.

Li, D. H., Wu, R. H., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Review research on scenic byway in China. Resource Development & Market, 34(2), 292-296.

Lin, J., Wu, T., Zhang, X. Y., & Zhao, Y. (2019). Thoughts on unifying the regulation of territorial space use. Journal of Natural Resources, 34(10), 2200-2208.

Liu, D. Y., & Zhou, B. (2001). A masterpiece of landscape planning－from Boston's Emerald Necklace to New England greenway planning. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 17(3), 60-62.

Liu, W. D. (2014). Research in human geography: getting closer to society, industry, and the state. Asian Geographer (forthcoming), http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10225706.2014.942946.

Liu, W. D. (2014). Economic geography for spatial governance. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(8), 1109-1116.

Ning, Z. Z., Wang, T., Qiu, Y. X., & Hu, X. J. (2017). Recreational industry planning along countryside green lanes: Yongan creek green lane, Xianju City, Zhejiang Province. Planners, 33(3), 89-95.

Shu, Q., & Liu, J. D. (1994). A kind of strange regional economic phenomenon-administrative economy. Strategy and Management, 5, 82-87.

Tao, X. D. (2008). China’s cross-boundary metropolitan area planning: institution recon struction and policy innovation. City planning review, 8, 36-43.

Wang, D. L. (2018). Cross-regional governance: research on the coordinated development of urban agglomeration. Jinan: Shandong University Press.

Wang, Y. Q., & Wei, H. K. (2015). National regional development strategy adjustment and response during the 13th five-year plan period. China Soft Science, 5, 83-91.

Xu, H. X., Sun, Z. Y., Hou, B. J., & Wei, S. (2019). Research on the spatial planning method of metropolitan area under the logical transition of planning. Journal of Natural Resources, 34(10), 2123-2133.

Yang, C. (2017). Policy, society, space: Construction and governance of French large-scale community (1850~2010). Urban Planning International, 32(4): 111-117.

Yang, L., & Hu, H. X. (2012). The adjustment of China's regional development strategy and its influence on the inter-governmental relations. Nankai Journal (Philosophy, Literature and Social Science Edition), 2, 35-47.

Yao, P., Sun, Y. H., Xi, Q. H., & Li, F. Z. (2019). Research on ecological scenic byways planning coupled with multiple values-taking Ulanqab Four Horizontal Traffic Belt as an example. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 35(4), 101-106.

Ye, Y. M., & Wang, C. Y. (2019). The review and prospect of spatial planning and governance in the past 40 years of reform and opening-up. Public Administration and Policy Review, 6, 25-39.

Yu, Q., & Han, M. (2019). Review and enlightenment of the centennial history of American national park roads and parkways. Journal of Natural Resources, 34(9), 1850-186.

Yu, Q., Song, Y., & Lin, S. L. (2009). Study of the national scenic byway assessment system of the United States. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 25(7), 93-96.

Yu, Q., Wei, Y., Wang, H. F. (2018). Theme scenic byway planning and design in American. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press.

Zhang, B. (2016). Coordinated development for the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region: A strategic trade-off in state spatial governance. Urban Planning Forum, 4, 15-21.

Zhang, L. X. (2019). Spatial governance and reconstruction of urban and rural spatial relations: logic, appeal and path. Theoretical Investigation, 5, 191-196.

Zhang, J. X., & Chen, H. (2014). Spatial governance: political economy of China’s urban and rural planning transformation. City Planning Review, 38(11), 9-15.

Zhang, J. X., & Xia, T. C. (2019). The change and reconstruction of spatial planning system under the goal of modern national governance. Journal of Natural Resources, 34(10), 2040-2050.

Zhen, F., Zhang, S. Q., Qin, X., & Xi, G. L. (2019). From informational empowerment to comprehensive empowerment: Exploring the ideas of smart territorial spatial planning. Journal of Natural Resources, 34(10), 2060-2072.