Research on How Precision Poverty Alleviation can Reduce Supply Chain Risks

Ying  Ge; Siyu  Zhu; Hanjin  He; Xinyan  Yu; Xin  Ge

doi:10.54691/bcpbm.v23i.1407

Authors

Ying Ge
Siyu Zhu
Hanjin He
Xinyan Yu
Xin Ge

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v23i.1407

Keywords:

Supply Chain Concentration; Commercial Credit Level; Supply Chain Risk; Targeted Poverty Alleviation.

Abstract

Based on the scenario of supply chain relationship, this paper selects companies that continuously disclose information on targeted poverty alleviation from 2016 to 2020, and establishes a two-way fixed effect model to explore the impact of targeted poverty alleviation on supply chain relationships. The study found that the scale of targeted poverty alleviation by enterprises will reduce the concentration of suppliers/customers, and at the same time reduce the level of commercial credit to improve the financing constraints of enterprises, and ultimately reduce the risk of enterprise supply chain. The government-led market-oriented poverty alleviation mechanism not only brings positive benefits to the society and the public, but also helps enterprises reduce risks in the dimension of supply chain relationships and achieve the dual pursuit of social responsibility and economic goals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Yan R.S., Tang S.X.. Can listed companies get government resource support for participating in targeted poverty alleviation? [J]. Securities Market Herald, 2020, (11): 2-10.

Ren C.Q., Wang Z.. Research on the influencing factors of enterprises' intervention in targeted poverty alleviation: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Perspective of Attention [J]. Soft Science, 2020, 34(6): 72-78.

Wang D.M., Lv B.. Research on the impact of supply chain management on corporate financial performance [J]. Management Review, 2010, 22(01): 94-104.

Zhang L.Q.. Analysis of enterprise supply chain management and supply chain strategy model [J]. Business Exhibition Economy, 2022(01):85-87.

Friedman M. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profit [J]. New York Times Magazine, 1970.

Li Y. H. Research on corporate social responsibility [D]. Northwestern University, 2007.

Zhang Z.G., Jin X.C., Li G.Q. An empirical study on the interaction between corporate social responsibility and financial performance over time [J]. Accounting Research, 2013, (8): 32-39.

Li H.Q., Zhang Z.G.. An empirical study on the impact of CSR on corporate reputation and customer loyalty [J]. Nankai Management Review, 2010, 13(01): 90-98.

Jo, H., Na, H. Does CSR Reduce Firm Risk? Evidence from controversial Industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 2012, 110(4): 441-456.

Hong, H., Kacperczyk, M. The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 2009, 93(1): 15-36.

Modi, S. B., Mishra, S. What drives financial performance: Resource efficiency or resource slack? Journal of Operations Management, 2011, 29(3): 254-273.

Karen, E. S., Marc, J. E. Exploring the financial value of a reputation for corporate social responsibility during a crisis. Corporate Reputation Review, 2005, 7(4): 327-345.

Peng J.G.. The reason, content and motivation of corporate social responsibility: The theory of "three causes, three colors and three forces" [J]. Macroeconomic Research, 2010 (1): 3 -9.

Feng J., Cheng W.L.. The economic motivation and influencing factors of corporate donations: a review and enlightenment [J]. Economics Dynamics, 2010(9): 138-141.

Zhang J.J.. Competition-commitment-obedience: the motivation of Chinese corporate charitable donations [J]. Management World, 2013(9): 118-129.