Status quo bias in behavioral economics and its applications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v25i.1842Keywords:
Status quo bias, Political elections, Organ Donors, EducationAbstract
The question of how individuals making decisions is of crucial interest in the field of economics and many other subjects. Evidences indicate that coming to the real-world decisions, many of people may tend to just stick with the default option instead of calculating the exact expected utility and making the most rational choices. In this paper, I will focus on this phenomenon and the psychological principles behind this. Results of empirical experiments and three specific applications including political elections, organ donations, school choices will be discussed.
Downloads
References
Thaler, R. H and Sunstein, C.R. (2009) Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness.
Druckman, J., Kifer, M and Parkin, M., (2019) LSE Phelan US centre: For an incumbent seeking reelection, focusing on their links to their district can often be enough to see off a challenger.
Kang, W, C., Park, W, H., and Song, B, K. (2018) The effect of incumbency in national and local elections: Evidence from South Korea.
Jacobson, G, C. (2015) It’s nothing personal: The decline of the incumbency advantage in US house elections Johnson, E, J., Goldstein, D. (2003) Do default save lives? Science, 302(5649):1338.
Johnson, E, J., Goldstein, D. (2003) Do default save lives? Science, 302(5649):1338.






