Digital Economy, Innovation Environment and Industrial Upgrading: Based on the Adjustment Effect and Threshold Model

Authors

  • Qianwen Yin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v25i.1863

Keywords:

Digital Economy, Innovation Environment, Industrial Upgrading, Adjustment Effect, Threshold Return

Abstract

Based on the panel data of 30 provinces in China from 2013 to 2020, we construct an adjustment effect model and a threshold model with residents’ consumption demand, labor force quality and financial resources as the moderating variables, and residents’ consumption demand as the threshold variable, in order to explore the influence process of digital economy on industrial upgrading. The empirical results show that: (1) The development level of digital economy has a significantly positive impact on the rationalization and advancement of industrial structure; (2) Residents’ consumption demand, labor force quality and financial resources all play a significant positive adjustment role in the digital economy-empowered industrial upgrading; (3) There exists a threshold effect in the digital economy-empowered industrial upgrading, i.e., when the residents’ consumption demand is between the two thresholds, the digital economy-empowered industrial structure rationalization is significantly promoted; when residents’ consumption demand crosses the first threshold, the digital economy-empowered industrial structure advancement is remarkably enhanced.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ma Zhongdong, Ning Zhaoshan. Digital Economy, Factor Allocation and Manufacturing Quality Upgrade [J]. Economic System Reform. 2020(03):24-30.

Fu Jiarong. Structure of Consumer Demand as the Fundamental Motive of the Industrial Structure Evolution-- Reflections on the Relationship Between Consumer Demand Structure and Industrial Structure[J]. Consumer Economics, 1997(02):22-26.

Hou Zhiyang, Dai Shuangxing. Binary Consumption Structure of Urban and Rural Residents and Industrial Structure Upgrading[J]. Enterprise Economy. 2001(08):10-11.

Gao Wenju, Qi Liangqun. Scientific and Technological Talents, Total Factor Productivity and High-quality Development of Equipment Manufacturing Industry[J]. China Science and Technology Forum. 2020(09):84-95+124.DOI:10.13580/j. cnki.

Zhang Changbing, Lou Xinwen & Li Yue. Empirical Test of the Coupling and Coordinated Development Relationship Between Financial Supply and High-end Manufacturing Industry: Based on the Financial Data of Listed Enterprises in High-end Manufacturing Industry [J]. Industrial Technical Economics. 2020,39(06):146-153.

Cai Yuezhou. National Governance Mechanism of Digital Economy— a data-driven science and technology innovation perspective [J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University (Social Science Edition),2021,20(02):39-49.DOI:10.16797/j. cnki.11-5224/c.20210406.010.

Duan Yongqin, He Lunzhi, & Ke Han. Digital Finance, Technology-intensive Manufacturing and Green Development[J]. Shanghai Economic Research, 2021(05):89-105.DOI:10.19626/j. cnki.cn31-1163/f.2021.05.009.

Gan Chunhui, Zheng Ruogu, & Yu Dianfan. The Impact of Industrial Structure Change on Economic Growth and Volatility in China[J]. Economic Research,2011,46(05):4-16+31.

Ding Shouhai, Xu Zheng. Digital Economy for Industrial Structure Upgrading in the New Pattern: Mechanism, Blockage and Path[J]. Journal of Theory. 2021(03):68-76. DOI:10.14110/j. cnki. cn-37-1059/d.2021.03.008.

[Ge Heping, Wu Fuxiang. Digital Economy Empowers High-quality Economic Development: Theoretical Mechanisms and Empirical Evidence[J]. Nanjing Social Science. 2021(01):24-33.DOI:10.15937/j. cnki. issn1001-8263.2021.01.003.

Cai Yanze, Gong Xinshu, & Jin Mei. Digital Economy, Innovation Environment and Manufacturing Transformation and Upgrading[J]. Statistics and Decision Making. 2021,37(17):20-24.DOI:10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2021.17.004.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-30

How to Cite

Yin, Q. (2022). Digital Economy, Innovation Environment and Industrial Upgrading: Based on the Adjustment Effect and Threshold Model. BCP Business & Management, 25, 516-526. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v25i.1863