S&P 500 Index and Volatility Forecast of Chinese Stock Market
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v26i.2009Keywords:
Volatility; Autoregressive Model; Out of Sample Prediction.Abstract
The main purpose of this article is to examine the role of the S&P 500 index in predicting the volatility of China's stock market. Our work is based on the autoregressive model (AR). We further extend this simple benchmark model by adding the volatility of the S&P 500 index. Intrasample regression shows that after adding this indicator, the overall goodness of fit of the model is rising, the explanatory ability is enhanced, and the added variables are also very significant. The out of sample prediction shows that, in terms of statistical test, the extended model has a positive out of sample R-square compared with the benchmark model, and has passed the CW test; In terms of economic test, we find that the extended model has positive CER and Sharp Ratio (SR) compared with the benchmark model. The out of sample predictions of these two aspects show that the newly added S&P 500 index has a good prediction effect. In addition, we also conducted various robustness tests, such as replacing the previous dependent variable (Shanghai Stock Exchange Index) with the CSI 300 index, replacing the previous extended window with a rolling window for prediction, and extending the previous single period prediction to multi period prediction. In the multi period forecast, we found that the S&P 500 index is only effective in a short period, for example, within 3 months, but cannot play a predictive role when it is extended to 6 months.
Downloads
References
Tong Gao, Hailong Zhu. Volatility Prediction Based on GARCH model and BP neural network model-based on daily data of SSEC [J]. Finance Economy, 2020 (09): 37-45
Andersen, T., & Bollerslev, T.. Answering the Skeptics: Yes, Standard Volatility Models do Provide Accurate Forecasts [J]. International Economic Review, 1998, 39(4), 885-905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2527343
Corsi, F.. A simple approximate long-memory model of realized volatility [J]. Financ. Economet, 2009, 7, 174–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbp001
Marcelle Chauvet, Zeynep Senyuz, Emre Yoldas.What does financial volatility tell us about macroeconomic fluctuations? [J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2015, 52, 340-360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2015.01.002
Sadorsky, P.. Modeling and forecasting petroleum futures volatility [J]. Energy Economics, 2006, 28, 467–488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2006.04.005
Kang, S.H., Kang, S.M., Yoon, S.M.. Forecasting volatility of crude oil markets [J]. Energy Economics, 2009, 31, 119–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2008.09.006
Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E., Hansen, P. R., Lunde, A., & Shephard, N.. Designing realized kernels to measure the ex post variation of equity prices in the presence of noise [J]. Econometrica, 2008, 76, 1481–1536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA6495
Yudong Wang, Yu Wei, Chongfeng Wu, Libo Yin. Oil and the short-term predictability of stock return volatility [J]. Journal of Empirical Finance, 2018, 47, 90-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2018.03.002
Campbell, J.Y., Thompson, S.B. Predicting excess stock returns out of sample: Can anything beat the historical average? [J]. Rev. Financ. Stud, 2008, 21, 1509–1531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm055
Clark, T.E., West, K.D.. Approximately normal tests for equal predictive accuracy in nested models [J]. J. Econometrics, 2007, 138, 291–311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.05.023
Inoue, A., Kilian, L.. In-sample or out-of-sample tests of predictability: Which one should we use? [J]. Econometric Rev, 2004, 23, 371–402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1081/ETC-200040785
Fuwei Jiang, Joshua Lee, Xiumin Martin, Guofu Zhou.Manager sentiment and stock returns [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2019, 132, 126-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.10.001
Goyal, A., Welch, I.. A comprehensive look at the empirical performance of the equity premium prediction [J]. Rev. Financ. Stud, 2008, 21, 1455–1508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm014
Guidolin, M., Na, C.F.. The economic and statistical value of forecast combinations under regime switching: an application to predictable US returns [J]. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper Series, (2006–059). DOI: https://doi.org/10.20955/wp.2006.059
Rapach, D.E., Strauss, J.K., Zhou, G. Out-of-sample equity premium prediction: Combination forecasts and links to the real economy [J]. Rev. Financ. Stud, 2010, 23, 821–862. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp063
Wang, Y., Wu, C., Yang, L. Oil price shocks and stock market activities: Evidence from oil-importing and oil-exporting countries [J]. J. Comp. Econ, 2013, 41, 1220–1239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2012.12.004
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
