Performance Analysis for Portfolio Construction and Stock Price Prediction of Social Media Platforms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v26i.2067Keywords:
component; Portfolio Construction; Stock Price Prediction; Social Media Platforms; ARIMA ModelAbstract
The stock price prediction and portfolio construction are very important in the application of quantified investments. Risk control and stock price prediction are two challenge problems that we want to solve. In this paper, two main steps are processed to quantify the risk and predict the stock price. Especially, the first step is portfolio optimization, which is based on the Mean-Variance method. The second step is the stock price prediction, which is designed based on the Arima-based method. The results show that the stock “TWTR” and the stock “WB” have the above 90% ratio of the stock combination, which shows that the “Twitter” and “Weibo” social media corporations have a higher expected return with a lower risk. In addition, the best ARIMA model used to fit our data will be the one with parameters p=4, d=0, q=3. Our research has great significance in the application of quantified investments.
Downloads
References
Markowitz H. Portfolio selection[J]. 1959.
Bodnar T, Zabolotskyy T. How risky is the optimal portfolio which maximizes the Sharpe ratio? [J]. AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, 2017, 101(1): 1-28.
Sharpe W F. Mutual fund performance[J]. The Journal of business, 1966, 39(1): 119-138.
Sharpe W F. The sharpe ratio[J]. Journal of portfolio management, 1994, 21(1): 49-58.
Krokhmal P, Zabarankin M, Uryasev S. Modeling and optimization of risk[J]. Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part II, 2013: 555-600.
Acerbi C, Tasche D. Expected shortfall: a natural coherent alternative to value at risk[J]. Economic notes, 2002, 31(2): 379-388.
Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber J M, et al. Coherent measures of risk[J]. Mathematical finance, 1999, 9(3): 203-228.
Acerbi C, Tasche D. Expected shortfall: a natural coherent alternative to value at risk[J]. Economic notes, 2002, 31(2): 379-388.
Alexander G J, Baptista A M. Economic implication of using a mean-VaR model for portfolio selection: A comparison with mean-variance analysis[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2002, 26(7-8): 1159-1193.
Alexander G J, Baptista A M. A comparison of VaR and CVaR constraints on portfolio selection with the mean-variance model[J]. Management science, 2004, 50(9): 1261-1273.
Kilianová S, Pflug G C. Optimal pension fund management under multi-period risk minimization[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2009, 166(1): 261-270.
Bodnar T, Schmid W, Zabolotskyy T. Minimum VaR and Minimum CVaR optimal portfolios: estimators, confidence regions, and tests[J]. Statistics & risk modeling, 2012, 29(4): 281-314.
Bodnar T, Schmid W, Zabolotskyy T. Asymptotic behavior of the estimated weights and of the estimated performance measures of the minimum VaR and the minimum CVaR optimal portfolios for dependent data[J]. Metrika, 2013, 76(8): 1105-1134.
Bai Z, Liu H, Wong W K. Enhancement of the applicability of Markowitz's portfolio optimization by utilizing random matrix theory[J]. Mathematical Finance: An International Journal of Mathematics, Statistics and Financial Economics, 2009, 19(4): 639-667.
Estrada J. Mean-semivariance optimization: A heuristic approach[J]. Journal of Applied Finance (Formerly Financial Practice and Education), 2008, 18(1).






