Model Comparison between CAPM and APT: With focus on application of Factor Models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v30i.2503Keywords:
Factor Model Comparison, CAPM and APT, Application of Financial Models.Abstract
Asset pricing theory has been one of the most rapidly growing research fields of western financial theory in the past few decades and one of the most significant theoretical tools extensively used in the financial industry, which attempts to interpret the price or value of assets paid in the future under uncertain circumstances. With increasingly more research on comparison between financial factor models, it is sometimes hard for scholars to have an explicit comprehension of various study of a certain topic. This paper aims to collect and analyse past research on comparing CAPM and APT, specifically focusing on the application aspect. The paper found that the CAPM needs careful time horizon screening while APT is more flexible. However, APT requires more data analysis for factor selection and sensitivity measurement. Both models prefer markets with many assets. The results of the paper provides useful information and insights to scholars who intend to do empirical study on the two models in hands on data collection preparation and model fitting process, which could potentially help them save time from try-and-error.
Downloads
References
W.F., Sharpe. CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK*. The Journal of Finance, 19: (1964),425-442.
R., Roll, & S. A., Ross. The Arbitrage Pricing Theory Approach to Strategic Portfolio Planning. Financial Analysis Journal, Vol. 51(1): (1995)122-131.
F.F., Eugene, R. F., Kenneth, Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds, Journal of Financial Economics, Volume 33, Issue 1, 1993, Pages 3-56, ISSN 0304-405X, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5.
N., Soufian. "Empirical Content of capital asset pricing model (CAPM) and arbitrage pricing theory (APT) across time." Manchester Metropolitan University. https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/1462
B., Alejandro, B., Beatriz, and B., Raquel. CAPM and APT-like models with risk measures, Journal of Banking & Finance, Volume 34, Issue 6, 2010, 1166-1174,DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.11.013.
C. W., French. "The Treynor Capital Asset Pricing Model". Journal of Investment Management. 1 (2): (2003)60–72. SSRN 447580.
J., Lintner. "The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets". Review of Economics and Statistics. 47 (1): (1965) 13–37. doi:10.2307/1924119. JSTOR 1924119
J., Mossin, Jan. "Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market". Econometrica. 34 (4): (1966)768–783. doi:10.2307/1910098. JSTOR 1910098.
J., Shanken. Multi-Beta CAPM or Equilibrium-APT?: A Reply. The Journal of Finance, 40(4), (1985). 1189–1196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2328402
[10] P.H., DYBVIG, and S.A., ROSS, (1985), Yes, The APT Is Testable. The Journal of Finance, 40: 1173-1188.DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb02370.x
J., Robert, R., Andrew. A comparison of the APT and CAPM a note. Journal of Banking & Finance Volume 7, Issue 2, 1983, Pages 295-303, ISSN 0378-4266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4266(83)90039-0
N.F., Chen, R., Roll, & S. A., Ross. Economic Forces and the Stock Market. The Journal of Business, 59(3), (1986)383–403. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2352710






