Case Analysis of Coca-Cola’s Sustainability

Authors

  • Ziyao Jia
  • Hanyue Ma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v31i.2537

Keywords:

Sustainability; CSR; Triple Bottom Line; Carroll’s Pyramid; Phrase Model; Coca-Cola.

Abstract

This paper analyzes Coca-Cola’s sustainability status and efforts based on three models: the Triple Bottom Line, the Phrase Model and Carroll’s Pyramid. Sustainability is a globally common concern, and Coca-Cola is actively involved by integrating sustainability into its corporate strategy. This paper lists and analyzes various ways Coca-Cola has contributed to sustainability, both inside and outside the company. These examples are related to employees, economic, environmental, legal, ethical, and philanthropic aspects. Based on a comprehensive sustainability analysis of Coca-Cola using the three models, the paper concludes that Coca-Cola primarily meets the requirements of the Triple Bottom Line and Carroll’s CSR Pyramid model for corporate sustainability. The company is currently in the second wave of the Phrase Model and is gradually working towards the third wave.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Isdell N. Coca-Cola Co (THE). Mergent’s Divident Achievers, 2007, 4(3): 64-64.

Slaper T F, Hall T J. The triple bottom line: What is it and how does it work. Indiana business review, 2011, 86(1): 4-8.

Alhaddi H. Triple bottom line and sustainability: A literature review. Business and Management Studies, 2015, 1(2): 6-10.

Padhee S, Nandan D. Design of Automated Visual Inspection System for Beverage Industry Production Line. Traitement du Signal, 2021, 38(2): 461-466.

Tien N H, Vu N T, Tien N V. The role of brand and brand management in creating business value case of Coca-Cola Vietnam. International Journal of Research in Marketing Management and Sales, 2019, 1(2): 57-62.

Clifton D. Sustain able strategies in the twenty-first century. Events, Society and Sustainability. Routledge, 2013: 265-276.

Benn S, Dunphy D. Can democracy handle corporate sustainability? Constructing a path forward. Innovation, 2004, 6(2): 141-155.

Kathayat A. A Case against CSR Initiatives. Open Journal of Business and Management, 2022, 10(2): 701-714.

Hassen R, Ghardadou S. The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Executive Compensation. Open Access Library Journal, 2020, 7: 1-8.

Archie B. Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: taking another look. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 2016, 1(3): 1-8.

Thacker H. Understanding the four levels of CSR. Thecsrjournal, available at: https://thecsrjournal. in/understanding-the-four-levels-of-csr, 2019.

Qianhao G, Shihui G, Yuke S, Shuya Z. Explore the Reasons for Coca-Cola’s High-profit Margins. International Conference on Financial Innovation and Economic Development, 2022, 648: 1430-1436.

Becchetti L, Ciciretti R, Conzo P. Legal Aspects of Corporate Social Responsibility. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law, 2014, 30(78): 1-6.

Amalric F. The Good Company: Confronting the Mainstream. Finance Bien Commun, 2005 (1): 93-100.

Gazzola P. Ethical Behaviour Integrated in CSR: How to create and maintain the Corporate Reputation. Economia Aziendale Online-, 2018, 9(2): 175-185.

Madhavan A. CSR at Coca-Cola. Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, 2012, 37(2): 94-98.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-05

How to Cite

Jia, Z., & Ma, H. (2022). Case Analysis of Coca-Cola’s Sustainability. BCP Business & Management, 31, 62-68. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v31i.2537