The Influence of "Reverse Mixed Ownership Reform" on the Internal Control of Private Enterprises

Authors

  • Xinru Huang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v31i.2651

Keywords:

Mixed ownership reform; Internal control; Corporate governance structure; Financing constraints.

Abstract

Under the background of mixed ownership reform, relying on the trend of "national advance and private retreat", this thesis takes the private enterprises in China's A-share listed companies from 2007 to 2020 as the research sample to explore the impact of "reverse mixed reform". In other words, it is the impact about the internal control entry of state-owned capital into private enterprises on internal control. It is found that the "reverse mixed reform" has significantly improved the internal control level of private enterprises, especially for enterprises that implement the equity incentive system and enterprises that do not concurrently serve as the chairman and general manager. Further research shows that corporate governance structure and financing constraints play a significant intermediary effect, which is especially helpful to alleviate the problem of difficult and expensive financing of private enterprises. This study examines the impact of the "reverse mixed ownership reform" of private enterprises from the perspective of internal control, enriches the relevant research on mixed ownership and internal control, and hopes to provide a theoretical and practical basis for the mixed ownership reform form of state-owned capital entering private enterprises.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wang Shuguang, Xu Yujiang. An empirical study on the development of private enterprises and the reform of mixed ownership -- Path Choice and policy framework [J] Journal of the National School of administration, 2017 (05): 78-84+146

MEGGINSON W L, NETTER J M. From state to market: a survey of empirical studies on privatization [J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2001, 39(2): 321-389.

Li Yuedong, Yan Qing. Institutional shareholding, ultimate property rights and internal control defects [J] Accounting research, 2017 (05): 83-89+97

Stefan F. Schantl, Alfred Wagenhofer, Optimal internal control regulation: Standards, penalties, and leniency in enforcement, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Volume 40, Issue 3, 2021, 106803, ISSN 0278-4254

Sheng liying, Feng Yanru. Can government subsidies improve corporate social responsibility—— Based on the empirical evidence of China's heavily polluting listed enterprises [J] Research on financial issues, 2022 (02): 84-94

Yi Yanxin, Wang Rong, Ye Jiying. Can independent supervisors reduce corporate violations—— Analysis of intermediary effect based on "big four" audit [J] Journal of Nanjing Audit University, 2022, 19 (02): 9-18

Zhang Genlin, Duan Tian. State owned capital, financing constraints and technological innovation of private enterprises -- Based on the background of mixed ownership reform [J] Friends of accounting, 2020 (02): 146-152

Zhu lile, Wu Fuxiang, Li Xue. Innovation capability of private enterprises: characteristic facts and action mechanism -- from the perspective of "reverse mixed reform" based on the introduction of state-owned capital by private enterprises [J] Financial science, 2021 (01): 76-90

Li Bingcheng, Wang Zhitao, Song Ruolan. Can the "reverse mixed reform" of private enterprises reduce audit fees? [J] Accounting communication, 2022 (01): 28-34

Su Sanmei, Liu Weifang. The impact of mixed ownership reform on internal control and debt cost -- An Empirical Study Based on psm-did model [J] Monthly journal of accounting, 2019 (18): 44-53

Duan Min, Fang Hongxing. Governance effect of mixed ownership on enterprise tax avoidance [J] Journal of Hunan University of science and Technology (SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION), 2022,25 (01): 73-83

Cheng Xiaoling, Wang Huaiming. The impact of corporate governance structure on the effectiveness of internal control [J] Audit research, 2008 (04): 53-61

Li Ruijing, Dang Suting, li Baixing, Yuan Rongli. CEO's information technology background and enterprise internal control quality [J] Audit research, 2022 (01): 118-128

Liu Anqin, Han Jinhong. Supervision or hollowing out: part-time senior management and internal control quality [J] Accounting communication, 2022 (07): 56-59+68

Liu Bin, Jin Xiuli, li Shuyuan. Research on the relationship between foreign shareholders and internal control in mixed ownership enterprises [J] Friends of accounting, 2019 (22): 154-160

Liu Yunguo, Zheng Qiao, Cai Guilong. Do non-state-owned shareholders improve the internal control quality of state-owned enterprises——Empirical evidence from state-owned listed companies! [J] Accounting research, 2016 (11): 61-68+96

Huang Yulian. Analysis on internal control of state-owned enterprises [J] Financial management research, 2019 (02): 16-19

Liu Qiliang, Zhaochao. Internal control, property right nature and operating efficiency [J] Audit monthly, 2014 (08): 12-15

Cui Jiujiu. Party committee participation in governance, internal control quality and performance of state-owned enterprises [J] Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and economics, 2021 (04): 15-23

Yu Minggui, Hui Yafu, Panhongbo. Political connection, rent-seeking and the effectiveness of local government financial subsidies [J] Economic research, 2010,45 (03): 65-77

Pan Ailing, Liu Xin, Wu Qian. Cross ownership M & A, institutional environment and debt financing cost of private enterprises [J] Accounting research, 2019 (05): 3-10

Zhang Zhiping, Fang Hongxing. Government control, political connection and enterprise information disclosure -- Taking the disclosure of internal control assurance report as an example [J] Economic management, 2013, 35 (02): 105-114

Tu Guoqian, Liu Feng. The nature and effect of checks and balances -- Empirical Evidence from China's privatized listed companies [J] Management world, 2010 (11): 132-142+188

Downloads

Published

2022-11-05

How to Cite

Huang, X. (2022). The Influence of "Reverse Mixed Ownership Reform" on the Internal Control of Private Enterprises. BCP Business & Management, 31, 362-368. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v31i.2651