Characteristic Evolution of Inter-Industry Liquidity Spillover Effect in China's Stock Market -- An Analysis based on Complex Network
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v32i.2854Keywords:
Liquidity spillover effect; VAR model; Granger causality network; Systematic risk; Leverage.Abstract
In recent years, the liquidity risk of China's stock market occurs frequently and spreads among different industries. The study of liquidity spillover is of great significance to prevent systematic financial risk. Based on the industry transaction data of China's stock market from 2011 to 2021, this paper calculates the market liquidity of different industry indexes, constructs Granger causality network in stages, and discusses the heterogeneity of the spillover effect of liquidity at the industry level in different economic stages. It is found that there is a significant liquidity spillover effect among industries; Compared with the stage of high leverage and loose monetary policy, under the background of stable macro leverage ratio and stable monetary policy, the liquidity spillover effect among industries will be weakened; The impact of liquidity has gradually changed from the spillover impact of traditional industries to the spillover impact of emerging industries.
Downloads
References
Chordia T, Roll R, Subrahmanyam A. Commonality in Liquidity [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2000, 56(1): 3-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00057-4
Nagel S. Evaporating Liquidity [J]. Cepr Discussion Papers, 2012, 25(7): 2005-2039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhs066
Amman M. and Zimmerman. H, Tracking Error and Tactical AssetAllocation [J], Financial Analysts Journal, 2001, 57: 32-43 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v57.n2.2431
X. C. Kan, J. B. Huang, Research on Difference and Commonality of Liquidity Between Different Industries Stocks [J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, 2007(03): 46-49.
C. Y. Jin, H. B. Zhang. A study of the spillover effects of industry sector liquidity in the Chinese stock market [J]. Economic Review Journal, 2016(12): 103-106.
Kyle, Albert S., and Wei Xiong. 2001. “Contagion as a Wealth Effect,” Journal of Finance, 56(4): 1401~1440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00373
Brunnermeier, Markus K., and Lasse Heje Pedersen. 2009. “Market Liquidity and Funding Liquidity” Review of Financial Studies, 22(6): 2201~2238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn098
Adrian, T., and H. S. Shin. Liquidity and Leverage [J]. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 2010, 19(3), 418-437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2008.12.002
Gulen, H. and Ion, M., 2016, “Policy Uncertainty and Corporate Investment”, Review of Financial Studies, 29(3), pp. 523-564.
Goetzmann W N, Massa M. Daily momentum and contrarian behavior of index fund investors [J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2002, 37(3): 375-389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3594985
Ukhov A D, Goyenko R Y, Stock and bond market liquidity: A long-run empirical Analysis [J], Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2009, 44(1): 189-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109009090097
Longstaff, F. A., The Flight - to -Liquidity Premium in U.S. Treasury Bond Prices, journal of Business, 2004 (77), 511~526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/386528
G. Andrew Karolyi, Kuan-Hui Lee, Mathijs A. van Dijk. Understanding commonality in liquidity around the world [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2012, 105 (1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.12.008
Amihud, Y. “IIliquidity and Stock Returns; Cross-section and Time-series Effects.” Journal off inancial markets, 2002, 5(1), pp.31-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-4181(01)00024-6
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
