Options Pricing Comparison between the Black-Scholes Model and the Binomial Tree Model: A Case Study of American Equity Option and European-style Index Option

Authors

  • Yawei Wu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v32i.2885

Keywords:

Option pricing; Equity Option; Index Option; Black-Scholes model; Binomial Tree model.

Abstract

In recent years, quantitative researchers used a wide range of models to price options, from the Black-Scholes model to more complex models such as the Heston model. This paper aims to analyze the effectiveness of the Black-Scholes model and the Binomial Tree model by using them to price Berkshire Hathaway’s equity options and European-style S&P 100 index options. The method used in this paper is gathering the market data of the options first. Second, using the data gathered to price the options by applying the Black-Scholes and Binomial Tree models. Third, comparing the derived theoretical price with the market price by getting the Sum of Square Errors. Lastly, determining the best model for each type of option. Through this research, the author found that comparing the two models, the Binomial Tree model derives a smaller Sum of Square Errors when pricing European-style index options, and the Black-Scholes model derives a smaller Sum of Square Errors when pricing American equity options. Thus, the Binomial Tree model is a better model to price European-style index options, and the Black-Scholes model is more effective when pricing American equity options.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Black F., Scholes M. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 1973, 81(3): 637-654.

Cox J. C., Ross S. A., Rubinstein M. Option pricing: A simplified approach. Journal of Financial Economics, 1979, 7(3): 229-263.

Hsia C. C. On binomial option pricing. Journal of Financial Research. 1983, 6(1): 41-46.

Rendleman R. J. Two-state option pricing. The Journal of Finance, 1979, 34(5):1093-1110.

Hull J. C. Options futures and other derivatives. Pearson Education India, 2003.

Merton R. C. Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, 3(1-2): 125-144.

Boyle P. P. Options: A monte carlo approach. Journal of Financial Economics, 1977, 4(3): 323-338.

Heston S. L. A closed-form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applications to bond and currency options. The Review of Financial Studies, 1993, 6(2): 327-343.

Kemmer G., Keller S. Nonlinear least-squares data fitting in Excel spreadsheets. Nature Protocols, 2010, 5, 267–281.

Itô K. On stochastic differential equations. American Mathematical Society, 1951.

Moral P. D. Feynman-Kac Formulae. Feynman-Kac Formulae, 2004, 47-93.

Merton R. C. Theory of rational option pricing. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 1973, 141-83.

Sharpe W. F. Investments. Prentice-Hall, 1978.

Dawid P. A. The Well-Calibrated Bayesian. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1982, 77(379): 605–610.

Ng K. H., Pooi A. H. Calibration Intervals in Linear Regression Models. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 2008, 37 (11): 1688–1696.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-22

How to Cite

Wu, Y. (2022). Options Pricing Comparison between the Black-Scholes Model and the Binomial Tree Model: A Case Study of American Equity Option and European-style Index Option. BCP Business & Management, 32, 168-177. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v32i.2885