Research on the Influence of Discount on Consumers’ Purchase Attractiveness and Coping Strategies -- Taking Consumers Aged 26-35 as an Example

Authors

  • Buxin Ren
  • Di Wu
  • Jiayi Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v34i.3050

Keywords:

Discount; Consumers’ purchase attractiveness; Coping strategies.

Abstract

Promotions are the driving force of consumption for E-commerce platforms, such as the “Double Eleven” shopping carnival in China, in which major e-commerce platforms participate, which has been setting new records for its volume over the past decade. Statistics from the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) show that online payment services exceeded ¥1.4 trillion in the shopping frenzy in 2019 (PBOC, 2019). The same is true in other parts of the world. For example, “Prime Day” in the United States is equivalently attractive for American shoppers. In addition to policy support and market dividends, discounting is an important stimulus for shopping campaigns to achieve such brilliant results. In order to make the discounts more attractive to consumers, merchants continue to push the boundaries of the traditional discounts, adding “direct discount”, “quantity discount”, “bundle discount”, “coupon discount”, and other diversified means of discounts. In recent years, the discount method of stacking multiple discounts together is becoming increasingly popular, and merchants often choose more than one discount at the same time, forming a multiple discount scheme. This paper studies how exactly multiple discounts affect consumers’ purchasing decisions. In particular, this paper explores the impact of multiple discount schemes on consumers’ purchase intentions through ordinary least-squared (OLS) linear regression and difference-in-difference (DID) techniques. The conclusion reached shows that the most effective discount strategies are quantity discounts and coupon discounts, giving an insight to online platform merchants on a potential way of boosting sales.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wang Xin, Xiao Chunqu, Zhu Hong. A discount added is an obstacle created: the impact of multiple discounts on consumer decisions [J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2020, 42(12): 56-71

Cai F Y, Bagchi R, Gauri D K. Boomerang effects of low price discounts: How low price discounts affect purchase propensity [J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2016, 42(5): 804–816.

Balachander S, Ghosh B, Stock A. Why bundle discounts can be a profitable alternative to competing on price promotions [J]. Marketing Science, 2010, 29(4): 624–638.

Biswas A, Bhowmick S, Guha A, et al. Consumer evaluations of sale prices: Role of the subtraction principle [J]. Journal of Marketing, 2013, 77(4): 49–66.

DelVecchio D, Krishnan H S, Smith D C. Cents or percent? The effects of promotion framing on price expectations and choice [J]. Journal of Marketing, 2007, 71(3): 158–170.

Krishna A, Currim I S, Shoemaker R W. Consumer perceptions of promotional activity [J]. Journal of Marketing, 1991, 55(2): 4–16.

Berkowitz, Eric N., and Walton, John R. (1980), “Contextual Influences on Consumer Price Responses: An Experimental Analysis,” Journal of Marketing Research, 17 (August), 349–58.

Monroe, Kent B. (1971), “Psychophysics of Price: A Reappraisal,” Journal of Marketing, 8 (May), 248–51.

Balachander S, Ghosh B, Stock A, “Why bundle discounts can be a profitable alternative to competing on price promotions [J]”. Marketing Science, 2010, 29(4): 624–638.

Darke P R, Dahl D W, “Fairness and discounts: The subjective value of a bargain [J]”. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2003, 13(3): 328–338.

Zhang Qing, Zheng Yining, “Pricing strategies for bundled products considering consumers’ green preference”. Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 344, 10 April 2022, 130962

Downloads

Published

2022-12-14

How to Cite

Ren, B., Wu, D., & Zhang, J. (2022). Research on the Influence of Discount on Consumers’ Purchase Attractiveness and Coping Strategies -- Taking Consumers Aged 26-35 as an Example. BCP Business & Management, 34, 461-469. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v34i.3050