Research on Regulatory Sandbox Setting for the Development Needs of Emerging Industries
-- Illustrated by the Case of Bike-sharing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v15i.331Keywords:
Emerging Industries; Regulatory Sandbox; Bike-sharing; Agile Governance.Abstract
Under the background of the Fourth industrial Revolution, emerging industries have been developing vigorously. While injecting innovative vitality into the society, they have also exposed problems such as lack of supervision, difficulty in risk control and policy lag in current government governance. By sorting out the application effect and experience of "regulatory sandbox", a nascent governance tool, in different fields around the world, this paper analyzed the applicability and necessity of introducing "regulatory sandbox" into the regulatory system of China's emerging industries from the perspectives of innovation demand, regulatory philosophy and institutional logic. This paper chose the Bike-sharing industry which is extremely representative as the research object. and the "regulatory sandbox" model of Bike-sharing industry is designed to clarify the responsibilities of stakeholders such as the supervision subject, testing subject and participating user of the sandbox, and to explain the operation mechanism such as access, test and exit. Finally, this paper also analyzes the common problems of regulatory sandbox in the development of emerging industries and the special problems in the Context of China. Following this paper, the nascent governance tools such as "regulatory sandbox" and the supervision philosophy of agile governance should be applied to more emerging industries to achieve the goal of balancing innovation and risk, improve regulatory efficiency, and encourage emerging industries to exert a positive influence on society.
Downloads
References
The rise and norms of digital economy [J]. Tsinghua Management Review,2019(Z1):88-92.
Xue LAN, Zhao Jing. Towards agile governance: A study on the development and supervision model of emerging industries [J]. Chinese Public Administration,2019(08):28-34.
Mukti Khaire. Fashioning an Industry: Cognitive Processes in the Construction of Worth of a New Industry[J]. Organization Studies,2014,35(1).
Violina P. Rindova, Antoaneta P. Petkova. When Is a New Thing a Good Thing? Technological Change, Product Form Design, Perceptions of Value for Product Innovations[J]. Organization Science,2007,18(2).
Introduction to the SEJ Special Issue on Business Models: Benoit Demil, Xavier Lecocq, Joan E. Ricart, Christoph Zott Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,2015,9(1).
Jiang X J. Government management and services in the era of big data: Enhancing capacity and coping with challenges [J]. Chinese Public Administration,2018(09):6-11.
Zhao Guanghui, Li Lingling. Regulation of new Transportation Service Business Model in the era of big data: A case study of ride-hailing [J]. Management world,2019,35(06):109-118.
EMA. Regulatory Sandbox Framework Version 2.0 [EB/OL]. https:// www. ema.gov. sg/media_ release. aspx? news_ sid=20171020Wab84AqS9NXY,2019-9-3.
Liao Fan. Review on the theory and Practice of regulatory sandbox under the background of fintech [J]. Journal of Xiamen University (Philosophy and Social Sciences),2019(02):12-20.
New Finance,2016(10):12-16. (In Chinese with English abstract).
World Economic Forum. Agile Governance: Reimagining Policy-making in the Fourth Industrial Revolution [R], 2018.
IOSCO, IOSCO Research Report on Financial Technologies, Research Report, February 2017.
FCA. Regulatory sandbox lessons learned report[R]. Britain: FCA,2017.
Goo J J, Heo J Y. The Impact of the Regulatory Sandbox on the Fintech Industry, with a Discussion on the Relation between Regulatory Sandboxes and Open Innovation[J]. Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity, 2020, 6(2):43.
Zhang Yiyan. Sandbox System of Supervision in South Korea [J]. Science and Technology China, 2020 (02): 100-101.
Liu G X. Legal reform promoting innovation in Japan: theory, arrangement and inspiration [J]. Science and technology progress and countermeasures,2020,37(18):114-122.
Sweden [EB/OL]. https://www.drivesweden.net,2017.
Sandbox regulation: Introduction of logic and local structure [J]. Southwest Financial,2019(03):53-63.
Zhang Jingzhi. The International Model of "Regulatory sandbox" and the Development path of Mainland China [J]. Financial Regulation Research,2017(05):22-35.
Zhao Jie, Mou Zongjie, SANG Guangliang. Research on international "Regulatory sandbox" model and its enlightenment to China [J]. Financial Development Studies,2016(12):56-61.
Li Dan. Accelerating the launch of the second batch of "Regulatory sandbox" pilot [J]. China Financier, 2020 (07):87-88.
Yang Weizhong, Director of the Operation Management Department of the Central Bank Study and establish the Chinese version of "regulatory sandbox" out of the box standard [EB/OL]. http:// finance. sina. com.cn/China/bwdt/2020-09-08/doc-iivhuipp3226530.shtml, 2020.
China Information and Communication Institute. 2017 Economic and Social Impact Report of Shared bikes. 2018.2.
Guo Peng, Lin Xiang-zhi, HUANG Yi, Tu Si-ming, Bai Xiao-ming, Yang Ya-wen, YE Lin. Journal of public management,2017,14(03):1-10+154.
[EB/OL]. http://www.qgxgw.org. 2016-10-24.
Institutional Analysis on the Reform of Large Department System in Urban Streets --Based on a Case Study of Dongcheng District, Beijing [J]. Yang Hongshan, Shi Jinxin. Journal of Beijing Administration Institute. 2019(02).
Wu Yunqing. "Sharing and Governance" to explore the new path of grassroots management [N]. Nanjing Daily, 2019-12-24(A04).
Liu Liang, Zou Jia jia. Regulatory sandbox: Foreign Application and Localization [J]. Southwest Finance, 2020 (05):17-24.
Ma Nan. Related issues and construction ideas of supervision sandbox construction in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area [J]. Southern Finance,2020(07):3-12.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
