Causality Between Firm-Level Governance and Firm Value

Authors

  • Anbang Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v35i.3362

Keywords:

Tobin’s Q; firm-level governance; firm value; causality; anti-takeover provisions.

Abstract

This paper investigates empirically whether there is a causal relation between firm-level governance and firm value. The firm-level governance quality is quantified by using anti-takeover provisions, which are classified boards, fair price, and poison pill. The firm value is measured by Tobin’s Q and return on assets in the part of Robustness Check. The data was found in platform WRDS, with database vendors of Compustat and Institutional shareholder services (ISS), ranged from 1998 to 2006, after data matching and data cleaning, with 1645 left. The regression results indicate that there is causality between firm-level governance and firm value, specifically that poor governance significantly contributes to the reduction of firm value. The robustness check has certified that the results in the regression analysis are credible. Further research will be desirable for firm data from countries such as China. In addition, the range of observation years of the data is expected to expand as data vendors have increased authority to access to the data.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bebchuk, L. and Cohen, A. (2005) ‘the Costs of Entrenched Boards’, Journal of Financial Economics, 78, pp. 409 - 433.

Demsetz, H., Lehn, K. (1985) ‘The structure of corporate ownership: causes and consequences’, Journal of Political Economy, (93), pp. 1155 – 1177.

Randall Morck., Andrei Shleifer., Robert W. Vishny. (1988) ‘Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis’, Journal of Financial Economics, Volume 20, January–March 1988, Pages 293 - 315.

John J. McConnell., Henri Servaes. (1990) ‘Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value’, Journal of Financial Economics, (27), (1990), pp. 595 - 612.

Larry Lang., René Stulz. (1994) ‘Tobin's Q, Corporate Diversification, and Firm Performance’, Journal of Political Economy, 1994, vol. 102, issue 6, 1248 - 80.

Yermack, D. (1996) ‘High Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors’, Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 185 - 211.

Daines, Robert, 2001. ‘Does Delaware law improve firm value?’, Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 525 - 558.

Chemmanur, Thomas J. and Krishnan, Karthik and Nandy, Debarshi K., How Does Venture Capital Financing Improve Efficiency in Private Firms? A Look Beneath the Surface (June 1, 2008). US Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies Paper No. CES-WP- 08 - 16.

Gompers, Paul A. and Ishii, Joy L. and Metrick, Andrew, Corporate Governance and Equity Prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 118, No. 1, pp. 107-155, February 2003.

Bebchuk, Lucian A. and Cohen, Alma, The Costs of Entrenched Boards. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 78, pp. 409-433, 2005, Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 478.

John E. Core., Wayne R. Guay., Tjomme O. Rusticus. (2006) ‘Does Weak Governance Cause Weak Stock Returns? An Examination of Firm Operating Performance and Investors' Expectations’, The Journal of Finance, (61), pp. 655 - 687.

Bebchuk, A., Coates, C. and Subramanian, G. (2003) ‘The power of takeover defenses’, Unpublished working paper, Harvard Law School and NBER.

Ryngaert, M. (1988) ‘The effect of poison pill securities on shareholder wealth’, Journal of Financial Economics, (20), pp. 377 – 417.

Comment, Robert & Schwert, G. William, 1995. "Poison or placebo? Evidence on the deterrence and wealth effects of modern antitakeover measures," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 3 - 43.

Garvey, T. and Hanka, G. (1999) ‘Capital structure and corporate control: the effect of antitakeover statutes on firm leverage’, Journal of Finance, (54), pp. 519 – 546.

Faleye, O. (2005) ‘Classified boards and long-term value creation’, Unpublished working paper, Northeastern University.

White, H. (1980) ‘A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica’ (48), pp. 817 – 838.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-31

How to Cite

Wang, A. (2022). Causality Between Firm-Level Governance and Firm Value. BCP Business & Management, 35, 632-640. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v35i.3362