Valuation of Coca-Cola's share price at the end of 2021 based on the SWOT analysis method of analyzing multiples valuation model

Authors

  • Enyu Yang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v37i.3584

Keywords:

Multiple Valuation Model; SWOT; Corporate Valuation.

Abstract

Appraising the enterprise value of a company in the soft drinks industry in terms of its earnings, fixed assets, intangible assets, goodwill, human resources, etc. has always been a complex issue. Given the convenience of the valuation method, analysts often choose to avoid complex valuation models by opting for multiple valuation models. When using the multiple valuation method, it becomes a question of how to use the correct multipliers and how to target the analysis to the soft drinks industry. In this article, PepsiCo, Monster Beverage Corp, and Nestlé SA were chosen as comparable companies and a multiple valuation model was used to derive three different Coca-Cola share prices at that time based on financial data at the end of 2021 using P/E, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Sales as multipliers respectively. It was found that the median could not be used as a multiplier for calculation purposes and that EV/Sales performed much worse than the other two multiples. In response to these two findings, the article makes several recommendations for valuation practices in the soft drinks industry and for the operations of soft drinks companies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lie E, Lie H J. Multiples used to estimate corporate value[J]. Financial Analysts Journal, 2002, 58(2): 44-54.

Yoo Y K. The valuation accuracy of equity valuation using a combination of multiples[J]. Review of Accounting and Finance, 2006.

Hu Y, Tian X, Zhu Z. Market transaction characteristics and pricing effect of accounting valuation models[J]. China Finance Review International, 2016.

Michaud R O. Demystifying multiple valuation models[J]. Financial Analysts Journal, 1990: 6-8.

Liu J, Nissim D, Thomas J. Equity valuation using multiples[J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 2002, 40(1): 135-172.

Wong J, Wong N. The Impact of Not Amortizing Intangible Assets on Valuation Multiples[J]. Pacific Accounting Review, 2005.

Laghi E, Di Marcantonio M, Cillo V, et al. The relational side of intellectual capital: An empirical study on brand value evaluation and financial performance[J]. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2020.

Barth M E. Fair value accounting: Evidence from investment securities and the market valuation of banks[J]. Accounting review, 1994: 1-25.

Bhojraj S, Lee C M C. Who is my peer? A valuation‐based approach to the selection of comparable firms[J]. Journal of accounting research, 2002, 40(2): 407-439.

Yin Y, Peasnell K, Hunt III H G. How do sell-side analysts obtain price-earnings multiples to value firms? [J]. Accounting and Business Research, 2018, 48(1): 108-135.

Ramaswami M. Multiple versus Multivariate Valuation Models[J]. Financial Analysts Journal, 1990, 46(5): 73-77.

Alford A W. The effect of the set of comparable firms on the accuracy of the price-earnings valuation method[J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 1992, 30(1): 94-108.

Madley-Dowd P, Hughes R, Tilling K, et al. The proportion of missing data should not be used to guide decisions on multiple imputation[J]. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2019, 110: 63-73.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-01

How to Cite

Yang, E. (2023). Valuation of Coca-Cola’s share price at the end of 2021 based on the SWOT analysis method of analyzing multiples valuation model. BCP Business & Management, 37, 334-341. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v37i.3584