Comparison of the Performances for Mean Reversion Strategy for DDAIF, Ford and VWAGY

Authors

  • Rongfan Bian

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v38i.3949

Keywords:

mean reversion; volatility market; unilateral tendency market; method points.

Abstract

The mean reversion strategy argues that investors should buy low and sell high, for there is an average line for the stock prices. The price will always meet the average line of it. When the price is higher than the average line, it will drop. When the price is lower, it will increase. To test and validate the effectiveness of this strategy, this study chose three stocks in auto industry to comparison the performance of this strategy on them. According to the analysis, when it is in volatility market, the strategy performances good in auto industry, but in unilateral tendency market, it may get a bad profit. This paper gives an exact way to calculate the buy and sell method point, which can make direction for people to trade. Besides, it makes comparison for the strategy in 3 different stocks in same field. Therefore, one can learn the performance of it on different shape of stocks. These results shed light on guiding further exploration of mean reversion strategy on auto industry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

De Bondt W F M, Thaler R. Does the stock market overreact?. The Journal of finance, 1985, 40(3): 793-805.

Yang X, Li H, Zhang Y, et al. Reversion strategy for online portfolio selection with transaction costs. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 2018, 11(1): 79-99.

Balvers R, Wu Y, Gilliland E. Mean Reversion across National Stock Markets and Parametric Contrarian Investment Strategies. The Journal of Finance, 2000, 55.

Kim M J, Nelson C R, Startz R. Mean reversion in stock prices? A reappraisal of the empirical evidence. The Review of Economic Studies, 1991, 58(3): 515-528.

Lo A W, MacKinlay A C. The size and power of the variance ratio test in finite samples: A Monte Carlo investigation[J]. Journal of econometrics, 1989, 40(2): 203-238.

Poterba J M, Summers L H. Mean Reversion in Stock Returns: Evidence and Implications. Journal of Financial Economics, 1987, 22.

Li B, Hoi S C H, Sahoo D, et al. Moving average reversion strategy for on-line portfolio selection. Artificial Intelligence, 2015, 222: 104-123.

Li B, Wang J, Huang D, et al. Transaction cost optimization for online portfolio selection. Quantitative Finance, 2017:1-14.

Ahmed R R, Vveinhardt J, Streimikiene D, et al. Mean reversion in international markets: evidence from G.A.R.C.H. and half-life volatility models. Ekonomska Istraivanja / Economic Research, 2018, 30(1):1198–1217.

Steiner A. Drawdown-at-risk Monte Carlo optimization. Available at SSRN 1782664, 2011.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-02

How to Cite

Bian, R. (2023). Comparison of the Performances for Mean Reversion Strategy for DDAIF, Ford and VWAGY. BCP Business & Management, 38, 1657-1665. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v38i.3949