Research on the Judicial Application of The Punitive Damages System for Environmental Infringement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v39i.4001Keywords:
Punitive damages; environmental infringement; regulatory path; comparative law.Abstract
Under the initiative of "a community with a shared future for mankind", the discussion of ecological environment protection is growing nationwide, and the legal issues that follow have also received more attention. For this reason, China has introduced the system of "punitive compensation" into the field of environmental tort in Article 1232 of the Civil Code to achieve the effect of ecological environmental protection. This paper will study from the perspective of comparative law, through comparing the legislative research and judicial application of punitive damages for environmental tort in China and the United States, and then clarify the legal regulation path of punitive damages for ecological environmental tort, and further improve the legal framework of punitive damages system.
Downloads
References
Han Y. Punitive Compensation for environmental infringement: Standard application and system improvement [J]. Jingchu Academic Journal.2022,23(01):76-84.
Zhang F, Sun Xiaoyu. Research on the application of Punitive Damages System in environmental public interest Litigation -- Also comment on the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on the Application of Punitive Damages in Hearing Cases of ecological and environmental Infringement Disputes.] Journal of Shandong Judge Training College.2022,38(02):19-32. p2
Final Declarationof the Third International Conference on Protection of the North Sea, Mar. 78,1990.1 YB Intl Envtl Law 1990(658):3.
Bergen Ministerial Declaration on Sustainable Development in the ECE Region, UN Doc. A/CONF. 151/PC/10 (1990), 1 YB Intl Enutl Law 1990(429): 4312.
Liu yi. The right ownership subject of punitive damages in the field of environmental liability [J]. Journal of hebei university of environmental engineering,2021,32(2):18-22.
Canadian Litigation for Violations of Customary International Law: Questions Remaining after Nevsun v Araya, Zullow, Jeremy, 80 U. Toronto Fac. L. Rev. 2022(122).
The Dilemma of Gender Inequality in the Delict of Seduction: A Zimbabwean Perspective and Some Lessons from South Africa, Mnkandhla, Sibongumuzi Zibusiso, Vengesai, Priccilar, 2022(55): 107-123.
The Unable or Unable or Unwilling Doctrine: A View from Private Law, Blum, Gabriella, Goldberg, John C. P.Harv. Int'l L.J. 2022(63): 63-134.
Ziesk-Socolov, Kyra. The Pandemic and the Public Nuisance: Judicial Intervention in the Era of COVID-19 and the Collective Right to Public Health, Wash. & Lee J. Civ. Rts. & Soc. 2022(28):1-64.
Bunker, Matthew D., Erickson, Emily. The Jurisprudence of Public Concern in Anti-SLAPP Law: Shifting Boundaries in State Statutory Protection of Free Expression, 44 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 2021-2022: 133-162.
Amanda. The Tragedy of Democratic Constitutionalism, Shanor,68 UCLA L. Rev. 2021-2022: 1302-1389.
Dolinskaya, Vladimira, Letuta, Tatiana.J ustice in Tort Law of Russia and China, 9 BRICS L.J. 2022: 87-113.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
