Cracking The Dilemma of Network Service Providers' Duty of Care: Based on The Perspective of Direct Benefit Acquisition

Authors

  • Dong Liu
  • Zhaojie Zhong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v39i.4006

Keywords:

Network service provider; duty of care;

Abstract

With the increasing scale of the domestic network economy, legal issues in this field continue to appear in our field of vision, such as the endless infringement of network users, which has become an important issue in the governance of the current network economy. Although China has introduced the "notice-delete" rule in the legislative field for the indirect infringement of network service providers, with the passage of time, the "notice-delete" rule has shown many shortcomings in terms of response speed and efficiency in protecting the rights and interests of right holders. Although some scholars have proposed the duty of care for network service providers in response to this phenomenon, there are many controversies in the field of domestic and foreign legal science and judicial circles on the duty of care. From the perspective of direct benefit acquisition, this paper takes how network service provider shall bear the responsibility the duty of care as the research object, analyzes the problem by case analysis and comparative research methods, and draws the conclusion that the conditions for obtaining direct benefits should be reasonably and appropriately used, so that network service providers can bear the corresponding duty of care for the direct benefits they have obtained, in order to promote the continuous improvement of the network service provider responsibility system, and make corresponding contributions to completely clearing up the chaos of network infringement and purifying the network environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

In the First Half of 2022, China’s Internet Business Revenue Was 717 billion Yuan, an Increase of 0.1% Year-on-Year. (2022, August 2). China Industrial Economic Information Network. http://www.cinic.org.cn/xw/tjsj/1331725.html

Yuan Ning.Internet service providers’ dual duties of copyright infringement [J]. Journal of Chongqing University (Social Science Edition),2020(5): 157-161.

Linyang Mao.A Study on the Copyright Examination Obligation of Network Service Providers [J]. Market Weekly, 2021(5):154-155

SMITH E, Lord of the files: International secondary liability for internet service providers [J]. WASH.&LEE L. REV, 2011,68:1555-1587.

MATTHIAS L, Structural aspects of secondary (provider) liability in Europe [J]. Journal of Intellectual Property Law Practice, 2014,9(1):75-90.

Zhiwen Liang.Copyright regulatory model for network service providers [J]. Science of Law, 2017(2): 107

Rebecca Giblin, When ISPs Become Copyright Police [J].2014 IEEE Internet Computing :84-87.

Althaf Marsoof, The Blocking Injunction- A Critical Review of Its Implementation in the United Kingdom Within the Legal Framework of the European Union [J].46 IIC (2015):632-664.

Christina Angelopoulos, Are Blocking Injunctions against ISPs Allowed in Europe? Copyright Enforcement in the Post-Telekabel EU Legal Landscape [J].9 J. INTEL. PROP. L.&P. (2014):812-821.

Lixin Yang.Understanding and Interpretation of Online Tort Liability Under the Tort Liability Law [J]. Journal of National Prosecutors College, 2010(2): 3-10.

Mengying Huang.New Solutions to the Determination of Tort Liability of Network Service Providers: From the Perspective of Directly Obtaining Economic Benefits [J]. Journal of Chongqing Radio & TV University,2022(1):39-40.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-22

How to Cite

Liu, D., & Zhong, Z. (2023). Cracking The Dilemma of Network Service Providers’ Duty of Care: Based on The Perspective of Direct Benefit Acquisition. BCP Business & Management, 39, 52-57. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v39i.4006