Portfolio Construction in Terms of APPL Based on Fama and French Five-factor Model

Authors

  • Yu Shi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v38i.4317

Keywords:

Fama French five factor; Stock market; Portfolio investment; β coefficient.

Abstract

In the contemporary world, research has been working towards creating a model that can better explain the relationship between financial investment and risk. Iterative financial models such as CAPM, Fama French three factor model (FF3F) are strengthening the explanatory power of the extra investment risk of portfolio investments. Nevertheless, due to the global pandemic, the variability of the explanatory power of financial analysis models in the stock market has become more fickle. The objective of this paper is to analyze the portfolio investment data of Apple, one of the world's largest high technology companies, from 2017 to 2022 using the Fama French five factor model (FF5F) to determine whether the model still has strong explanatory power on the stock market during the pandemic. According to the analysis, the FF5F model coefficients still robust in explaining Apple's stock markets over five-year global pandemic period. It seems as if the epidemic and similar force majeure factors do not affect the explanatory efficiency of the model, but it is unknown that whether the actual impact is not captured by the FF5F model. The results of this study based on the FF5F model shed lights for reducing portfolio investment risks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Sharpe W F. Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The Journal of Finance, 1964, 19.4: 425-442.

Lintner J. Security prices, risk, and maximal gains from diversification. The Journal of Finance, 1965, 20.4: 587-615.

Markowitz H M. Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance 1952, 7.1: 77-91.

Fama E F, French K R. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 1993, 33.1: 3-56.

Carhart M M. On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of Finance, 1997, 52.1: 57-82.

Fama E F, Kenneth R F. A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of financial economics, 2015, 116.1: 1-22.

Huang T L. Is the Fama and French five-factor model robust in the Chinese stock market? Asia Pacific Management Review, 2019, 24.3: 278-289.

Hou D W, Chen Z R. Research on the application of Fama-French 5-factor model in the steel industry during COVID-19. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, 1865: 4.

Foye J. A comprehensive test of the Fama-French five-factor model in emerging markets. Emerging Markets Review, 2018, 37: 199-222.

Lin Q. Noisy prices and the Fama–French five-factor asset pricing model in China. Emerging Markets Review 2017, 31: 141-163.

Frankel R M, Charles L. Accounting valuation, market expectation, and the book-to-market effect." Market Expectation, and the Book-to-Market Effect, 1998.

Faff R W. A simple template for pitching research. Accounting & Finance 2015, 55.2: 311-336.

Robert N M. The other side of value: The gross profitability premium. Journal of financial economics 2013, 108.1: 1-28.

Chiah M, Chai D, Zhong A, et al. A Better Model? An empirical investigation of the Fama–French five‐factor model in Australia. International Review of Finance, 2016, 16(4): 595-638.

Aharoni G, Grundy B, Zeng Q. Stock returns and the Miller Modigliani valuation formula: Revisiting the Fama French analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 2013, 110.2: 347-357.

Ragab N S, Abdou R K, Sakr A M. A comparative study between the Fama and French three-factor model and the Fama and French five-factor model: Evidence from the Egyptian stock market. International Journal of Economics and Finance 2019, 12.1: 52-69.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-02

How to Cite

Shi, Y. (2023). Portfolio Construction in Terms of APPL Based on Fama and French Five-factor Model. BCP Business & Management, 38, 3417-3422. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v38i.4317