Visual Analysis of the Employee Performance Research Literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v42i.4543Keywords:
Employee Performance; Bibliometrics; CiteSpace; Web of Science.Abstract
To visualize the current state of employee performance research, this paper uses CiteSpace visualization software to mine and analyze the content of research in this field during 2012-2021, and then presents it in the form of a knowledge graph. The study specifically explores the distribution of journal publications, authors, institutions, and hot topics and trends in the field of employee performance. Through the visual analysis of 656 publications, we found that: (1) the output size of employee performance research field showed a growing trend during 2012-2021. (2) A European research team with GEORGIOS BOUSTRAS as the core has been formed, but the amount of articles issued by each author is relatively small; research institutions are concentrated in universities, and the connection between institutions is relatively close. (3) The hot areas can be summarized into three key words: "organization", "management", and " model". (4) The "critical success factor", "mediating role", and "workplace" are the cutting-edge developments and trends in this field.
Downloads
References
H-John Bernardin, Beatty Richard-W. Performance appraisal: Assessing human behavior at work[M]. Boston, Ma.: Kent Publishing Company, 1984.Fangfang. Research on power load forecasting based on Improved BP neural network. Harbin Institute of Technology, 2011.
Charlotte-H Campbell, Ford Patrick, Rumsey Michael-G, et al. Development of multiple job performance measures in a representative sample of jobs[J]. Personnel psychology, 1990, 43(2): 277-300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990.tb01559.x
Chun-Fang Chiang, Hsieh Tsung-Sheng. The impacts of perceived organizational support and psychological empowerment on job performance: The mediating effects of organizational citizenship behavior[J]. International journal of hospitality management, 2012, 31(1): 180-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.04.011
Stephan-J Motowildo, Borman Walter-C, Schmit Mark-J. A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance[J]. Human performance, 1997, 10(2): 71-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_1
James-B Avey, Reichard Rebecca-J, Luthans Fred, et al. Meta‐analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance[J]. Human resource development quarterly, 2011, 22(2): 127-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20070
Robert-J Riggle, Edmondson Diane-R, Hansen John-D. A meta-analysis of the relationship between perceived organizational support and job outcomes: 20 years of research[J]. Journal of business research, 2009, 62(10): 1027-1030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.05.003
Work-Engagement Empowerment. A review of literature on the associations among employee empowerment, work engagement and employee performance[J]. Modern Applied Science, 2018, 12(11): 313-329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v12n11p313
Joyce-Elena Schleu, Hüffmeier Joachim. Simply the best? A systematic literature review on the predictive validity of employee performance for leader performance[J]. Human Resource Management Review, 2021, 31(2): 100777.. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100777
Eli-Ayawo Atatsi, Stoffers Jol, Kil Ad. Factors affecting employee performance: a systematic literature review[J]. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-06-2018-0052
Chaomei Chen. Science mapping: a systematic review of the literature[J]. Journal of data and information science, 2017, 2(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2017-0006
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
