Research on the Competition of Chinese Cosmetics Brands Comparing with Western Cosmetics Brands
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v44i.4803Keywords:
Chinese cosmetics brands; Business strategy; Competitive strategy; Market challenge.Abstract
The Chinese cosmetics market used to be dominated by the foreign cosmetics brands, while Chinese cosmetics brands has been growing rapidly since 2020. Reviewing the related research implies that there are multifaceted factors influencing Chinese consumers’ preference towards domestic or foreign brands. Generally, Chinese consumers show high intention to purchase Western products, as they perceive those products of high quality and value. However, from the case study of the success of Perfect Diary in the Chinese market in recent years, it is noticed that this new cosmetics brand is highly competitive in the market comparing to other Western brands. The marketing strategy adopted by Perfect Diary contributes to the sales and business success. Perfect Diary’s skincare and cosmetics products are well perceived by the Chinese consumers, as they tend to produce the products to fit the local demands. Western cosmetics brands tend to only provide standardized products to the customers in China, which is the reason why the competitive advantage of the products is challenged now in the Chinese market. The competitive pricing strategy of Perfect Diary also makes the brand competitive in the Chinese market compared to Western brands. However, it is important for Chinese cosmetics brands to improve their marketing strategies in the Chinese market to sustain their market competitiveness.
Downloads
References
Amine, L. S., Chao, M. C., & Arnold, M. J. (2005). Executive insights: Exploring the practical effects of country of origin, animosity, and price–quality issues: Two case studies of Taiwan and Acer in China. Journal of international marketing, 13(2), 114-150.
Laforet, S., & Chen, J. (2012). Chinese and British consumers’ evaluation of Chinese and international brands and factors affecting their choice. Journal of World Business, 47(1), 54-63.
Swoboda, B., Pennemann, K., & Taube, M. (2012). The effects of perceived brand globalness and perceived brand localness in China: Empirical evidence on Western, Asian, and domestic retailers. Journal of International Marketing, 20(4), 72-95.
Zhan, L., & He, Y. (2012). Understanding luxury consumption in China: Consumer perceptions of best-known brands. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1452-1460.
Wang, C. L., & Chen, Z. X. (2004). Consumer ethnocentrism and willingness to buy domestic products in a developing country setting: testing moderating effects. Journal of consumer Marketing.
Zhou, L., & Hui, M. K. (2003). Symbolic value of foreign products in the People's Republic of China. Journal of international marketing, 11(2), 36-58.
Wang, X., & Yang, Z. (2008). Does country‐of‐origin matter in the relationship between brand personality and purchase intention in emerging economies? Evidence from China's auto industry. International marketing review.
Kaynak, E., Kucukemiroglu, O., & Hyder, A. S. (2000). Consumers’ country‐of‐origin (COO) perceptions of imported products in a homogenous less‐developed country. European Journal of Marketing.
Kumar, A., Lee, H. J., & Kim, Y. K. (2009). Indian consumers' purchase intention toward a United States versus local brand. Journal of business research, 62(5), 521-527.
Lim, K., & O’Cass, A. (2001). Consumer brand classifications: an assessment of culture‐of‐origin versus country‐of‐origin. Journal of product & brand management, 10(2), 120-136.






