Trade Liberalization and Trade Protection Based on Game Theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v44i.4900Keywords:
Trade disputes; China; United States; Game theory; Trade.Abstract
Under the background of economic globalization, economic and trade exchanges are increasingly close. While countries enjoy the dividends brought by the global economy, trade competition is also more intense. In order to protect their own economic and political interests, countries usually adopt the policies of trade liberalization or trade protection policy protectionism. The total economic volume of China and the United States is huge, so the trade frictions between the two countries will attract the attention of the world trade countries. The choice of trade policies between the two countries will also affect the economic level and economic and trade relations of both countries and even the development of the entire world economy. Therefore, from the perspective of game theory and international trade, this paper analyzes the choice of trade policy in world trade by calculating the Nash equilibrium in the choice of trade policy and the welfare changes caused by the implementation of tariffs. Through game theory analysis, the results show that trade protection and trade liberalization in world trade are both contradictory and coexist. In order to protect the development of their important industries, countries can adopt reasonable subsidy policies or protection policies to support them under the framework of WTO. However, countries should actively promote global economic governance and actively promote the development of multilateral trade and regional economy. It provides some ideas for the choice of trade policy in the context of trade war.
Downloads
References
Xue Rongjiu. The characteristics, harm and containment of trade protectionism under economic globalization. International Trade, 2009 (03): 28 - 31.
Cui Qingbo. A new round of trade protectionism and China's regional trade liberalization strategy. Shanghai University of Foreign Trade and Economic News, 2021, 28 (04): 76 - 90.
Yin Xiangshuo, Li Chunding, Sun Lei. Types, causes, effects and solutions of international trade frictions. World Economy, 2007 (07): 74 - 85.
Guo Minsheng. The game behind the "Sino-US trade war" and suggestions for countermeasures. Chinese Inventions and Patents, 2018,15 (08): 28 - 37.
Peng Xu. Game issue-based teaching is an effective way to cultivate the core quality of political identity -- taking the Sino-US trade war as an example. Proceedings of the conference of the "Advanced Seminar on Teaching and Research Projects and Paper Writing" of the Professional Committee of Education Modernization of the Guangdong Education Association, February 4, 2019.
Chen Jiyong. Background, reason, essence and China's countermeasures of Sino-US trade war 2021: 72 - 81.
Liu Ying Strategic research on Sino-US trade frictions from the perspective of evolutionary game [D] Hebei University of Economics and Trade, 2019.
Zhang Xiaobao. Analyzing the trade war between China and the United States from the perspective of game theory. Journal of Jiamusi Institute of Education, 2019.
Guo Bin. The game coexistence of trade freedom and trade protection under the WTO framework. Jiangsu Business Review, 2007 (20): 127 - 127.
Wan Guangcai, Chen Xinxin. Game analysis of Sino US trade friction under the impact of the COVID-19. Journal of China Ocean University: Social Science Edition, 2021 (3): 11.






