Study On Risk Identification of Corporate Supply Chain Finance Based on ISM-MICMAC Model

Authors

  • Yuxuan Zhao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v48i.5253

Keywords:

Risk Identification of Supply Chain Finance, ISM-MICMAC Model, Risk Factors.

Abstract

It is crucial to accurately identify the main influencing factors of supply chain finance risk, analyze their mechanism of action and construct a system of influencing factors for risk management of supply chain finance. This paper examines the three parties involved in supply chain finance, including the financial institution, the core enterprise, and the SMEs, and screens out 21 major risk factors from them. This study calculates the adjacency matrix and accessibility matrix by using SPSSPRO, then constructs the interpretative structural modeling method (ISM) and the recursive structure diagram. Combining the Matrix-based Multiplication Applied to a Classification (MICMAC), this paper classifies the influencing factors into four categories: autonomous category, dependent category, linkages category, and independent category. The results show that: (1) the factors that constitute the deepest level of risk in supply chain finance are crediting false trade, non-standard bill of lading, data information security risk, imperfection of business process design, et cetera. (2) Among all factors, three factors are identified as the autonomous category, nine as the independent category, and nine as the dependent category with no linkages category.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Tian Kun, Zhuang Xintian, Zhao Wanting.Credit risk assessment of the SMEs under the supply chain finance model--analysis based on data from the automobile manufacturing industry[J]. Industrial Technology Economics,2021,40(05):15-20.

Li Juan, Nie Yong. Analysis of risk inducing factors of supply chain finance and its mechanism of action: based on the root theory[J]. Finance and Accounting Monthly, 2021(16):146-151.

Sun C.Y., Xu X. Y. Research on Risk Assessment of Agricultural Supply Chain Finance: Based on GA-BP Neural Network Model[J]. Technology Economics and Management Research, 2021(08): 78-82.

Zhang H, Shi Y, Yang X, et al. A firefly algorithm modified support vector machine for the credit risk assessment of supply chain finance[J]. Research in International Business and Finance, 2021, 58: 101482.

Deng Puhui. Study on risk management of supply chain finance of G bank [D]. Guilin University of Electronic Science and Technology,2022

Hu Biliang, Liu Qingjie. Country risk measurement, Assessment and Prevention of "One Belt, One Road" Investment[J]. Learning and Exploration, 2023, No.330(01):87-109+204.

Liu Zhiyang. The main functions, risk characteristics and regulatory supervision of fintech[J]. Southern Finance,2021(10):63-71.

Huang Yijun, Lian Shoumei.The core enterprisesupply chain finance risk identification and assessment--Take the telecommunication industry as an example[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (Social Science Edition), 2016,18(03):44-49.

Liu, Yang, Wang, Huijun, Zheng, Qing. Blockchain+supply chain finance helps the SMEs financing model[J]. Marketing World, 2022(21):93-95.

Cheng Yihan. The study of investment risk prevention mechanism for SMEs[J]. The strait science and industry,2022,35(05):53-55.

The Impact of Commodity Price Changes on Costs[J]. The impact of commodity price changes on costs and countermeasures[J]. Fiscal Science, 2022(02): 5-18.

Wang Q.Y., Wang H.S. Study on factors affecting credit risk of agricultural the SMEs under supply chain finance[J]. Technology and Economy, 2023, 36(01): 61-65.

Warfield, J.N. Toward interpretation of complex structural models. [J] IEEETrans. Syst. ManCybern. 1974, 4, 405-417.

Duperrin JC, GodetM. SMIC74-A Method for Constructing and Ranking Scenarios[J]. Futures, 1975, 7(4):302-312.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-24

How to Cite

Zhao, Y. (2023). Study On Risk Identification of Corporate Supply Chain Finance Based on ISM-MICMAC Model. BCP Business & Management, 48, 85-92. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v48i.5253