Research on the Impact of Executive Characteristics on Enterprise Digital Transformation:Moderating Effects Based on the Level of Enterprise Risk-taking

Authors

  • Luwen Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v49i.5460

Keywords:

Enterprise digital transformation; executives' overseas background; executives' academic background; executives' financial background; enterprise risk-taking.

Abstract

Using a sample of A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2013 to 2019 and based on upper echelons theory, this paper explores the impact of executives' overseas background, academic background and financial background on enterprise digital transformation, and also examines the moderating effects of enterprise risk-taking. It finds that executives' overseas background, academic background and financial background are all positively associated with enterprise digital transformation. Furthermore, enterprise risk-taking can enhance the positive relationship between executives' overseas background, academic background and enterprise digital transformation, but weaken the positive impact of executives' financial background on enterprise digital transformation. These findings possess theoretical significance in enriching studies in related domains, so as to offer important practical insights into optimizing top management team composition and facilitating the digital transformation of companies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Y Chun, X Tusheng, G Chunxiao, S Yu. Digital Transformation and Division of Labor between Enterprises:Vertical Specialization or Vertical Integration[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2021, (9): 137-155.

S Hongtao, W Tong. Enterprise Digital Transformation,Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Value[J]. Technology Economics, 2022, 41(7): 159-168.

L Qinyang, Z Jia, L Xiangqiang. Enterprise Digital Transformation and Capital Allocation Efficiency[J]. Statistics & Information Forum, 2023, 38(3): 70-83.

Z Zhengang, Z Junqiu, Y Baosheng, C Yihua. The Impact of Digital Transformation on Business Model Innovation[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2022, 39(11): 114-123.

S Mingming, W Zhenqin. Digitalization Level, Strategic Flexibility and Innovation Performance —Based on the Analysis of Threshold Effect of High-Tech Enterprises[J]. Finance and Accounting Monthly, 2023, 44(5): 136-144.

Y Xianan, Z Ximing, T Shaoqing. The Impact Mechanism of Manufacturing Enterprises' Digital Transformation on Financial Performance[J]. China Business and Market, 2022, 36(7): 96-106.

H Fan, L Hongxia. The Performance Improvement Effect of Digital Transformation Enterprises from the Digital Economy Perspective[J]. Reform, 2019, (4): 137-148.

Gang W , Jr R , Oh I S , etc. Do CEOs matter to firm strategic actions and firm performance? A meta-analytic investigation based on upper echelons theory[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2016, 69(4): 775-862.

X Fei, H Qingsong. Modernization of Management and R&D Innovation[J]. Modernization of Management, 2017, 37(5): 44-46.

Crossland C , Zyung J , Hiller N J , etc. CEO Career Variety: Effects on Firm-Level Strategic and Social Novelty[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2014, 57(3): 652-674.

Lin C , Ma Y , Officer M S ,et al.CEOs' Military Experience and Acquisition Decisions[J].Ssrn Electronic Journal, 2011.

Tihanyi,L.Composition of the Top Management Team and Firm International Diversification[J].Journal of Management, 2000, 26(6):1157-1177.

Z Zhaoguo, C Danting, Z Chi. Does TMT Stability Affect Enterprise Technological Innovation Performance?—The Moderating Effect of Compensation Incentive and Human Relationship[J]. Accounting Research, 2018, (12): 48-55.

Z Jianjun, Z Yanlong. Chairman-CEO Heterogeneity, Power Differential, Rapport and Organizational Performance[J]. Management World, 2016, (1): 110-120.

Eisenhardt K M, Schoonhoven C B.Organizational Growth:Linking Founding Team, Strategy, Environment, and Growth Among U.S.Semiconductor Ventures,1978-1988[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1990, (35).

L Jihui, T Qing, W Fei. Chairman's R&D Background and Enterprise Digital Transformation:Empirical Evidence from Big Data Identification of Annual Report Texts of Chinese Listed Companies[J]. Technology Economics, 2022, 41(8): 60-69.

L Xilu, C Zhijun, M Pengcheng. CEO with Information Technology Background and Enterprise Digital Transformation[J]. China Soft Science, 2023, (1): 134-144.

Z Kunxian, C Xiaorong. Who Promotes Digitalization? —Empirical Research Based on Upper Echelons Theory and Imprinting Theory[J]. Research on Economics and Management, 2021, 42(10): 68-87.

T Xuan, G Xing, Z Tianqi, D Shengtao. Executive Team Heterogeneity and Corporate Digital Transformation[J]. China Soft Science, 2022, (10): 83-98.

W Haojun, L U Yushu, S Tiebo. Seeking Change in Stability? TMT Stability and Enterprise Digital Transformation[J]. R & D Management, 2023, 35(2): 97-110.

HAMBRICK D C, MASON P A. Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9(2): 193-206.

H Jiejun, Z Lekai, S Hui. Management Background and Global Value Chain Participation:evidence from Listed Companies[J]. Industrial Economics Research, 2020, (2): 73-86, 142.

W Yanjie, Y Fei, Z Jua. The Effects of Executives' Overseas Backgrounds on Enterprise Innovation: Empirical Evidence from A-share Listed Companies in China[J]. Modern Management Science, 2022, (6): 75-85.

Y Chun, X Tusheng, G Chunxiao, S Yu. Digital Transformation and Division of Labor between Enterprises:Vertical Specialization or Vertical Integration[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2021, (9): 137-155.

Y Jing, W Yundong. Senior Managers' Academic Background and Innovation Investment from the Perspective of Market Competitive Position:An Evidence from Resource-based Listed Companies[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, 2021, (6): 56-65.

W Shaomian. The Effects of Academic Background of Executives on Enterprise Digitization[D]. Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, 2022

C Qian, S Yanping, H Xin. Will the CEO's Financial Background Increase the Company's Total Factor Productivity?[J]. Technology Economics, 2020, 39(11): 127-135.

Byrd, D. T.,Mizruchi, M. S..Bankers on the board and the debt ratio of firms[J].Journal of Corporate Finance -Amsterdam-.2005,11(1).

T Xiaofang, W Hankun. Senior Management Financial Background, Combination of Industry and Finance and Enterprise Value[J]. Scientific Decision-Making, 2019, (7): 57-90.

BOUBAKRI N,COSSET J C,SAFFAR W. The role of state and foreign owners in corporate risk-taking: evidence from privatization[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2013, 108(3):641-658.

WRIGHT P, FERRIS S P, SARIN A, et al. Impact of corporate insider, blockholder, and institutional equity ownership on firm risk taking [J]. Academy of Management Journal,1996,39(2):441-458.

H Ying, Y Wenlei, Y Mianzhi. CEOs with Rich Career Experience, Corporate Risk-taking and the Value of Enterprises[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2019, (9): 155-173.

W Huacheng, W Yu, H Jingjing, C Yijing. Independent Directors with Foreign Experience and Executive Compensation Contract[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Philosophy and Social Science), 2015, (3): 67-75.

L Yanling, Z Weiwei, L Yilin, K Lin. Interim CEO Succession and Firms' Innovation Investment Intensity —Empirical Research on Chinese Listed Companies[J]. R & D Management, 2021, 33(6): 124-141.

Y Minggui, L Wengui, P Hongbo. Managerial Overconfidence and Corporate Risk-taking[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2013, (1): 149-163.

M Yan, L Jianyang. The Influence of Directors' Sources Diversity on Risk-taking[J]. Accounting Research, 2019, (7): 35-42.

M Ju, L Jie, Z Bowen. CEOs'Multi-career Background and Enterprise Digital Transformation[J]. Modern Finance and Economics-Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, 2022, 42(9): 37-58.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-16

How to Cite

Wang, L. (2023). Research on the Impact of Executive Characteristics on Enterprise Digital Transformation:Moderating Effects Based on the Level of Enterprise Risk-taking. BCP Business & Management, 49, 544-557. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v49i.5460