Risk Prevention of the Rural Idle Homesteads Transfer in Nanhai District of Foshan City based on the System for Separating Rural Land Ownership Rights

Jinwei Huang; Haoyi Chen

doi:10.54691/bcpbm.v13i.72

Authors

Jinwei Huang
Haoyi Chen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v13i.72

Keywords:

System for Separating Rural Land Ownership Rights; Rural Homestead Land Use-right; Risk Prevention.

Abstract

With the comprehensive deepening of the new round of rural land reform and the acceleration of urbanization, we urgently need to pre-judge and protect the risks in the process of homestead transfer, to clarify, correct and summarize the deficiencies of the transfer system, and to develop, perfect and innovate in practice, so as to reduce the risks encountered by farmers in the process of transferring Homestead, and strengthen farmers' willingness to transfer. Taking Nanhai District of Foshan City, one of the 33 pilot projects of the System for Separating the Ownership rights as an example, this paper analyzes and summarizes the risk factors in the process of rural idle homestead transfer from the perspective of farmers by using the method of questionnaire survey and binary logistic regression analysis model. Through logistic regression analysis, it is found that farmers' willingness to transfer homestead in Nanhai District are significantly connected with six variables including farmer's occupation and number of homestead. Based on the regression results, this paper will put forward countermeasures to local government to avoid the risk of homestead transfer for the sake of better homestead circulation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wu, Y. Z., Mo, Z. B., Peng Y., Martin S., Market-driven land nationalization in China: A new system for the capitalization of rural homesteads. Land Use Policy, 2018, 70(1): 559-569.

Qing, J., The Reform of Homestead System and the Increase of Farmers' Property Income [J], Rural Economy and Science-Technology, 2019, 30(19):13-15.

Daniel, C., Morrison, T.H., Phinn, S., The governance of private residential land in cities and spatial effects on tree cover [J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2016(62)79–89.

Wu, M., Yan, J., Chen, H., Study on Risk Management of Rural Homestead Transfer based on Supply and Demand Theory [J], Modern Management Science, 2017(05):30-32.

Wu L., Li, H., Wen, F., et al. Study on the Governance of Rural Idle Homestead [J], Rural Economy and Science-Technology, 2019(03):44-45.

Zhou, J., Explore and Deepen the Reform of "Three Rights Division" in Rural Homestead[J]. Modern Economic Research, 2019(11):117-125.

Huy, H.T., Lyne, M., Ratna, N., et al. Drivers of transaction costs affecting participation in the rental market for cropland in Vietnam[J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2016, 60 (3): 476-492.

Zhao, B., Zhang, H., A Brief Discussion on the Ways to Withdraw from Rural Homestead with Compensation [J]. Agricultural Economy. 2019(10):96-98.

Ghosh S., Chifos, C., The 1985 siting of a Toyota manufacturing plant in rural Kentucky, USA: The ensuing land use change and implications for planning[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2017(167): 288-301.

Bai, W., On the Reform of Rural Homestead System in the New Era[J], Western Resources, 2019 (04): 171 -172.

Liu, L., Research on the Willingness of Farmers to participate in the Transfer of Gomestead Use Right --- Based on the Survey of Farmers in Dingzhou City [J]. Social Scientists, 2019(07):63-69.

Sorensen. Land expropriation without compensation in South Africa. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 2019, 76(01): 5-6.

Nie, J., Zhong, Z., [J], Substitution Degree of Farmland Security Function and Reaction of Farmers on the Farmland Transfer [J], China Polulation.Resources and Environment, 2015, 25(01):103-111.