Reconciling Modernity and Environmentalism: A Futile Yet Beautiful Effort

Yueran Chen

doi:10.54691/fsd.v3i2.3814

Authors

Yueran Chen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/fsd.v3i2.3814

Keywords:

Reconciling Modernity; Environmentalism; Contemporary Modernity.

Abstract

The ultimate beauty in the contemporary pursuit of the ecological transition lies not within finding a harmonious balance between social, economic and environmental objectives, but within the collective self-reflection urged by this existential threat. This study, thus, wishes to contribute to the exploration of the relationship between humans and their surroundings by investigating whether modernity and environmentalism are compatible. As it is out of the scope of this paper to discuss all possible combinations of the two given the rich theoretical frameworks that have been established, this study limits itself to the following assumptions. First of all, modernity and environmentalism are only viewed at a collective level (group of people with the same political representative and subscribed to the same political ideology) to put it differently. Secondly, I consider environmentalism as a mode of living that can be continued forever given all other factors being constant. Lastly, this study attributes two different temporalities to the notion of modernity; retrospective and contemporary. With these assumptions in mind, I argue that modernity and environmentalism are not compatible in either of the cases.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Sweeney, T. (2021, May 27). The ecology of a different modernity. Genealogies of Modernity. Retrieved May 13, 2022, from https://genealogiesofmodernity.org/journal/2021/3/22/terence-review.

Beck, U., Lash, S., & Wynne, B. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity (Vol. 17). sage.

Mouzakitis, A. (2017). Modernity and the Idea of Progress. Frontiers in Sociology, 2, 3.

Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern (C. Porter, Trans.). Harvard university press. (Original work published in 1991).

Akkerman, A. (2019). Philosophical urbanism: lineages in mind-environment patterns. Springer Nature.

Latour, B. (2018). Down to earth: Politics in the new climatic regime (C. Porter, Trans.). John Wiley & Sons. (Original work published in 2017).

Dobson, A. (2016). Environmental politics: A very short introduction (Vol. 457). Oxford University Press.

Tuan, Y. (2013). Romantic Geography: In Search of the Sublime Landscape. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, Print.

Li, T. M. (2014). What is land? Assembling a resource for global investment. Transactions of the institute of British Geographers, 39(4), 589-602.

Aronoff, K., Battistoni, A., Cohen, D. A., & Riofrancos, T. (2019, February 7). A Green New Deal can give us the freedoms to allow humanity to flourish. The Guardian. Retrieved May 12, 2022, from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/feb/07/green-new-deal-climate-change-us -politics.

Bhambra, G. K. (2014). Modernization Theory, Underdevelopment and Multiple Modernities. Connected Sociologies. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 19-38.

United Nations. (2014). Country classification. https:// www.un. org/en/ development/ desa/ policy/wesp/wesp_current/2014wesp_country_classification.pdf.

Schmelzer, M. (2017). The growth paradigm: History, hegemony, and the contested making of economic growthmanship. In Routledge Handbook of the History of Sustainability (pp. 164-186). Routledge.

Yoon, H., Sauri, D., & Domene, E. (2019). The water-energy vulnerability in the Barcelona metropolitan area. Energy and Buildings, 199, 176-189.

WHO. (2013). How much water is needed in emergencies. TECHNICAL NOTES ON DRINKING-WATER, SANITATION AND HYGIENE IN EMERGENCIES https://cdn. who.int/ media/docs/default-source/wash-documents/who-tn-09-how-much- water-is-needed.pdf?sfvrsn=1e876b2a_6.

Wolff, J. (revised 3rd edn) (2015). An Introduction to Political Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Head, B.W. (2022). Political Governance of Wicked Problems. Wicked Problems in Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.