Research on Cost Sharing and Coordination of Low Carbon Supply Chain in the Context of Carbon Neutrality Strategy

Yuanhao Yang

doi:10.54691/s87c6096

Authors

Yuanhao Yang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/s87c6096

Keywords:

Carbon Emission Reduction Level; Low Carbon Supply Chain; Cost Apportionments.

Abstract

For carbon emissions under the limit of supply chain cost sharing problem, based on the Shared contract perspective starkerberg game model includes the manufacturers and retailers, analyzes the cost sharing ratio, carbon trading price and unit carbon tax emissions on the supply chain, and the optimal strategy combination and carbon reduction cost allocation ratio is studied. The results show that the one-way cost sharing model is beneficial to the reduction of low carbon supply chain, while the two-way cost sharing model has a positive effect on the reduction of supply chain within the small allocation ratio. In addition, the sharing proportion of manufacturers is within a certain range, and the two-way emission reduction mode is the optimal choice for the supply chain. Meanwhile, the sharing proportion will affect the choice between decentralized and centralized decisions. In addition, the numerical analysis shows that the carbon emission reduction levels increase with the increase of carbon trading prices. The results have good reference significance for the carbon emission reduction decision and carbon reduction cost sharing contract among members of the low-carbon supply chain.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Xie Xue-mei, Zhu Qi-Wei. Innovation Fulcrum or Conservative Yoke: How can green supply chain management Practices leverage firm Performance? [J]. Management Science in China,2022,30(05):131-143.C. Li, W.Q. Yin, X.B. Feng, et al. Brushless DC motor stepless speed regulation system based on fuzzy adaptive PI controller, Journal of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, vol. 29 (2012), 49-52.

Meng Xin,Yu Yanni. Can renewable energy portfolio standards and carbon tax policies promote carbon emission reduction in China's power industry?[J]. Energy Policy,2023,174.J. Liu, E.L. Chen and Z.T. He: Journal of Shi Jia Zhuang Railway Institute (Natural Science), Vol. 22 (2009) No. 4, p.40-42.

Zhou Zhenglong,Hu Fengying,Xiao De. Optimal pricing strategy of competing manufacturers under carbon policy and consumer environmental awareness[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2020,150.

Dan Wu,Yuxiang Yang. The Low-Carbon Supply Chain Coordination Problem with Consumers’ Low-Carbon Preference[J]. Sustainability,2020,12(9).

Junyan Tian,Xin Qu,Zhijing Wu. Supplier Production Importance Evaluation Model Based on RSR Comprehensive Evaluation Method and TOPSIS Method[J]. Journal of Network Computing and Applications,2021,6(1).

Technology - Cybernetics; Findings in the Area of Cybernetics Reported from Nankai University (Impact of Carbon Regulations On the Supply Chain With Carbon Reduction Effort)[J].Global Warming Focus,2019.

Tchorzewska K.B.,Garcia-Quevedo J.,Martinez-Ros E.. The heterogeneous effects of environmental taxation on green technologies[J]. Research Policy,2022,51(7).

Meng Xin,Yu Yanni. Can renewable energy portfolio standards and carbon tax policies promote carbon emission reduction in China's power industry?[J]. Energy Policy,2023,174.

Li Jian,He Zhou,Wang Shouyang. A survey of supply chain operation and finance with Fintech: Research framework and managerial insights[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2022.

Alikhani Reza,Ranjbar Amirhossein,Jamali Amir,Torabi S. Ali,Zobel Christopher W.. Towards increasing synergistic effects of resilience strategies in supply chain network design[J]. Omega,2023, 116.