Analysis of CAFTA's promotion effect on FDI based on DID model

Authors

  • Wenzhuo Su

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v20i.1077

Keywords:

CAFTA; FDI; DID.

Abstract

CAFTA (China-ASEAN Free Trade Area) has a strong promotion effect on FDI after its formal establishment, including both indirect effects due to trade liberalization and direct effects through investment and investment facilitation. This paper uses World Bank data from 2000-2019 for a quasi-natural experiment established by CAFTA using double differencing and concludes that CAFTA has a significant enhancing effect on FDI, and that the level of economic development, the rate of development, and the degree of trade liberalization of each member country within its free trade area have a significant impact on FDI. Meanwhile, this paper uses heterogeneity test to show that the establishment of CAFTA in countries with clean government and high education level is conducive to the increase of FDI. Countries with low contracting efficiency and high tax share will further improve the system due to the establishment of CAFTA, which is conducive to the further development of FDI.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Viner J. The custom union issue[M]. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,1950.

Kindleberger C P. European Integration and the International Corporation[J]. Columbia Journal of World Business, 1996, 1(1): 65-76.

Baldwin R, Forslid R, Haaland J. Investment Creation and Investment Diversion: Simulation Analysis of the Single Market Programme [R]. NBER Working Paper, No5364, 1995.

Neary J P.Foreign Direct Investment and the Single Market[J].The manchester school, 2002, 70(3): 291-314

Galgau O, Khalid S. The Impact of the Single Market on Foreign Direct Investment in the European Union[A]. Exchange Rates, Economic Integration and the International Economy[C]. Toronto: APF Press, 2004.

Tekin-Koru.North-South Integration and the Location of Foreign Direct Investment [J]. Review of International Economics, 2010(4): 696 -713.

Bende-Nabende A, Ford J L, Slater J R. The Impact of FDI on the Economic Growth of the ASEAN-5 Economics,1970-94:A Comparative Dynamic Multiplier Analysis from a Small Model with Emphasis on Liberalization[R]. Department of Economics, University of Birmingham in its series Discussion Papers, with number 9718, 1999.

Du Qunyang, Song Yuhua. The FDI Effect of China-ASEAN Free Trade Area [J]. International Trade Issues, 2004(3): 51-44.

Dong Yan. Can South-South regional economic integration promote FDI inflows? ——Analysis on the effect of attracting investment in China-ASEAN Free Trade Area [J]. Nankai Economy, 2006(6): 70-88.

Zhao Yuhuan, Wang Shuai. Research on the Investment Effect of China-ASEAN Free Trade Area [J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Science Edition), 2011(4): 13-17

Wang Zhanao, Chen Xiaoqian. Research on the investment effect of China-ASEAN Free Trade Area [J]. East China Economic Management, 2013 (6): 65-69. [14] Lu Yue, Lu Yi, Wu Songbo, et al. The Outward Investment Promotion Effect of the "One Road" Initiative——Based on the Double Difference Test of Greenfield Investment of Chinese Enterprises from 2005 to 2016 [J]. Economic Research, 2019(9): 187-202.

Tan Mi, Li Shimei,Zou Zhongquan. Empirical analysis of FDI promotion effect of China-ASEAN free trade area formally established--a double difference test based on quasi-natural experiments from 2000-2018[J]. Guangxi Social Science,2022(02):49-58.

Cai X, Lu Y, Wu M, et al. Does Environmental Regulation Drive away Inbound Foreign Direct Investment? Evidence from a Quasi-natural Experiment in China [J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2016 (8): 73-85.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-28

How to Cite

Su, W. (2022). Analysis of CAFTA’s promotion effect on FDI based on DID model. BCP Business & Management, 20, 885-896. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v20i.1077