A Comparative Analysis of Educational Policies for Disabled People in China and Britain
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v41i.4427Keywords:
China; Britain; educational policy; education for the disabled.Abstract
In many nations, education for the disabled members of their communities has proven to be a challenge. The level of education of the disabled reflects the level of education, welfare level and civilization of the country. Due to the differences in economic, political, cultural and social, and objective geographical location, historical background and other factors in the world, the development of education for the disabled in different countries has its characteristics. Therefore, this study selects two countries, China and the United Kingdom, for comparative analysis, and compares the differences between the two countries in terms of education for people with disabilities by integrating and analyzing relevant literature and comparing the laws and regulations on the protection of the right to education of people with disabilities in both countries. This study is significant as it enables researchers to understand where Chinese education for the disabled falls short compared to that of the UK, thus, making critical recommendations for policy change to favor the education of the disabled in China. The results of the study indicate that while Britain practices inclusive education for people with disabilities, China has adopted the Integrated Education development model as the main line of development and reform. Whichever mode of inclusion a country takes up, it is important to ensure fair and just treatment of people with disability. The document concludes by stating that China's future potential can enhance the policy of education for the disabled and can focus on future research direction.
Downloads
References
Education for the disabled in China has developed over the past 70 years (2019). Retrieved from https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_4890990
Williams-Brown, Z., & Hodkinson, A. Development of inclusive education in England: impact on children with special educational needs and disabilities. Handbook on Promoting Social Justice in Education, 2020, 1561-1583.
Thomas, G., & Vaughan, M. Inclusive education: Readings and reflections. Maidenhead, UK: Open University, 2004.
UNESCO. The Salamanca statement and framework for action. Madrid, Spain: UNESCO/Ministry of Education and Science, 1994.
Sikes, P., Lawson, H., & Parker, M. Voices on: Teachers and teaching assistants talk about inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 2007, 11(3), 355–370
Lu Deyang. Persons with Disabilities and the Development of Education for Persons with Disabilities in Modern China. Journal of Shanghai Normal University (Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 41(5).
Wangwei. The Development, Problems and Trends of Special Education in Britain. Department of Curriculum and Teaching. East China Normal University, Modern Special Education. 2006, 33-35.
Peng Xiaguang. Practice, Reflection and Enlightenment of Inclusive Education in Developed Countries in Europe and America. Chinese Journal of Special Education (Monthly), 2020, 246(12).
Pangwen. Evolution Course, Experiential Reflection and Future Prospects of Chinese Inclusive Education since the Reform and Opening Up. Disability Research. Theoretical Discussion, 2020, 40(4): 52-53.
Chen Xuefei. A Case Study of the implementation of Higher Education for People with Disabilities in the UK. Shaanxi Normal University, 2020: 19-21.
Pangwen. Data Analysis and Discussion on Educational Equity for People with Disabilities in China. Journal of educational development, 2016, 34-35.
Burchardt, T. The education and employment of disabled young people: frustrated ambition. Policy Press, 2005.
Miller, M., Mittler, P., & Parker, D. Promoting the rights of children with disabilities. UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, 2007, 1-66.






