Educational Inequality: Meritocracy trap in the 21st century

Authors

  • Yunjie Xiong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v41i.4436

Keywords:

Educational inequality; meritocracy; elites; social economic status; schooling; cultural capital; human capital.

Abstract

In the past few decades, social scientists have paid more and more attention to the relationship between the accomplishments and advantages people gain from the education system and socio-economic inequality. However, few studies try to explore that in real practice, when people acquiesce to the rules of meritocracy, they will still respect the left behind and discuss these inequalities. Neglecting the significant influence of outside factors and placing the blame on people's hearts can result in a variety of harms to a person's physical and mental development, including symbolic violence and loss of concern. In this paper, the origin and market basis of performance excellence will be discussed, which makes performance the standard on which people live. When meritocracy claims to provide equal opportunity, family-based inequality issues still come into play. Reviewing the inequality of social and economic status helps to clarify the human capital, cultural capital and other factors in the growth process. Mirroring the literature, several solutions include improving the evaluation strategy or coming up with a fresh approach to achieving growth-oriented education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Warikoo NK, Fuhr C. Legitimating Status: Perceptions of Meritocracy and Inequality among Undergraduates at an Elite British University. British Education Research Journal, 2014(4): 699-717.

Bills D. Credentials, Signals, and Screens: Explaining the Relationship between Schooling and Job Assignment. Review of Educational Research, 2003(73(4)):441-449.

Rivera LA. Hiring as Cultural Matching: The Case of Elite Professional Service Firms. American Sociological Review, 2012(77(6)):999–1022.

Meyer JW. The Effects of Education as an Institution. American Journal of Sociology, 1977(83):55-77.

Gerber TP, Cheung S Y. Horizontal Stratification in Postsecondary Education: Forms, Explanations, and Implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 2008(34):299–318.

Bowles S, Gintis H. Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. Haymarket Books, 2011.

Downey DB, Hippel P T V, Broh B A. Are Schools the Great Equalizer? Cognitive Inequality during the Summer Months and the School Year. AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2004(69):613–635.

Lareau A. Invisible Inequality: Social Class and Childrearing in Black Families and White Families. American Sociological Review, 2002(67):747-776.

Farkas G. Cognitive Skills and Non-cognitive Traits and Behaviors in Stratification Processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 2003(29):541-562.

Soares JA. For Tests that are Predictively Powerful and Without Social Prejudice. RESEARCH & PRACTICE IN ASSESSMENT, 2011(7):2012.

Lynch K, Baker J. Equality in education: An equality of condition perspective. Theory and Research in Education, 2005(3).

Downloads

Published

2023-03-17

How to Cite

Xiong, Y. (2023). Educational Inequality: Meritocracy trap in the 21st century. BCP Business & Management, 41, 230-235. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v41i.4436