Research on the Influencing Factors of Carbon Assurance Disclosure Quality from The Perspective of External Audit Quality

Authors

  • Hui Chen
  • Zixuan Song
  • Fan Zhao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v20i.902

Keywords:

Carbon Assurance Disclosure; Audit Quality; DRS; CRITIC-TOPSIS; WLS.

Abstract

To realize the goal of "carbon neutral", enterprises need to carry out the CDP carbon disclosure project and the independent audit carbon assurance under pressure from carbon regulation. Therefore, based on the external audit quality perspective, this paper examines the factors influencing the quality of carbon assurance that are important for the development of carbon assurance market business. Firstly, 58 listed companies with heavy carbon emissions in China are selected as the research objects, and the evaluation index system for DRS companies' carbon guarantee is established. Then, considering the volatility and conflicting properties of the indicators, we use the combination of weighting entropy and the CRITIC method, measuring the driving factor, response factor, and status factor of carbon assurance quality through the TOPSIS method. Moreover, this article establishes a weighted linear regression model to explore the premise of state-owned equity and the degree of portfolio leverage as control variables. Audit quality is significantly and positively correlated with carbon assurance. In addition, State ownership and DCL are positively and negatively correlated with carbon assurance quality, respectively. Finally, this paper puts forward relevant suggestions for accounting firms to develop a perfect carbon assurance process and improve the quality of carbon assurance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Olson, E. G., 2010, Challenges and opportunities from greenhouse gas emissions reporting and independent auditing, Managerial Auditing Journal 25, 934–942.

Datt, R., L. Luo, Q. Tang, and G. Mallik, 2018, An international study of determinants of voluntary carbon assurance, Journal of International Accounting Research 17, 1-20.

Li Xue, Yang Wisdom. Re-conceptualization of the definition of environmental auditing [J]. Journal of Nanjing Audit Institute, 2004(01):62-66.

Wang Aiguo. Carbon auditing abroad and its inspiration to China[J]. Audit Research,2012(05):36-41.

Wang A.H., Li S.S. Construction of evaluation index system of DRS model for corporate low-carbon audit[J]. Audit and Economic Research, 2016,31(02):42-51.

Zheng Shiqiao. On carbon audit results and their application [J/OL]. Finance and Accounting Monthly:1-5 [2022-03-21].

Pergo P.2010.Causes and Consequences of Choosing Different Assurance Providers: An International Study of Sustainability Reporting [J]. International Journal of Management 26(3):412-425.

Simnett, R., A. Vanstraelen, and W. F. Chua. 2009. Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. The Accounting Review 84 (3): 937–967.

Zeng, Chang-Li, Li, Jiang-Tao. Government environmental auditing and environmental performance improvement[J]. Audit Research,2018(4):44-52

Chow, C. W. 1982. The demand for external auditing: Size, debt, and ownership influences. The Accounting Review 57 (April): 272–291.

Nini, G., A. Sufi, and D. C. Smith. 2011. Creditor Control Rights, Corporate Governance, and Firm Value. Working paper, University of Pennsylv

Downloads

Published

2022-06-28

How to Cite

Chen, H., Song, Z., & Zhao, F. (2022). Research on the Influencing Factors of Carbon Assurance Disclosure Quality from The Perspective of External Audit Quality. BCP Business & Management, 20, 42-49. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v20i.902